A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Role of Survey Training Materials in Stated-Preference Studies.

Caroline M Vass, Niall J Davison, Geert Vander Stichele, Katherine Payne
{"title":"A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words: The Role of Survey Training Materials in Stated-Preference Studies.","authors":"Caroline M Vass, Niall J Davison, Geert Vander Stichele, Katherine Payne","doi":"10.1007/s40271-019-00391-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online survey-based methods are increasingly used to elicit preferences for healthcare. This digitization creates an opportunity for interactive survey elements, potentially improving respondents' understanding and/or engagement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to understand whether, and how, training materials in a survey influenced stated preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was designed to elicit public preferences for a new targeted approach to prescribing biologics (\"biologic calculator\") for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with conventional prescribing. The DCE presented three alternatives, two biologic calculators and a conventional approach (opt out), described by five attributes: delay to treatment, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, infection risk, and cost saving to the national health service. Respondents were randomized to receive training materials as plain text or an animated storyline. Training materials contained information about RA and approaches to treatment and described the biologic calculator. Background questions included sociodemographics and self-reported measures of task difficulty and attribute non-attendance. DCE data were analyzed using conditional and heteroskedastic conditional logit (HCL) models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 300 respondents completed the DCE, receiving either plain text (n = 158) or the animated storyline (n = 142). The HCL showed the estimated coefficients for all attributes aligned with a priori expectations and were statistically significant. The scale term was statistically significant, indicating that respondents who received plain-text materials had more random choices. Further tests suggested preference homogeneity after accounting for differences in scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using animated training materials did not change the preferences of respondents, but they appeared to improve choice consistency, potentially allowing researchers to include more complex designs with increased numbers of attributes, levels, alternatives or choice sets.</p>","PeriodicalId":89489,"journal":{"name":"The female patient","volume":"155 1","pages":"163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7075825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The female patient","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-019-00391-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online survey-based methods are increasingly used to elicit preferences for healthcare. This digitization creates an opportunity for interactive survey elements, potentially improving respondents' understanding and/or engagement.

Objective: Our objective was to understand whether, and how, training materials in a survey influenced stated preferences.

Methods: An online discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was designed to elicit public preferences for a new targeted approach to prescribing biologics ("biologic calculator") for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with conventional prescribing. The DCE presented three alternatives, two biologic calculators and a conventional approach (opt out), described by five attributes: delay to treatment, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, infection risk, and cost saving to the national health service. Respondents were randomized to receive training materials as plain text or an animated storyline. Training materials contained information about RA and approaches to treatment and described the biologic calculator. Background questions included sociodemographics and self-reported measures of task difficulty and attribute non-attendance. DCE data were analyzed using conditional and heteroskedastic conditional logit (HCL) models.

Results: In total, 300 respondents completed the DCE, receiving either plain text (n = 158) or the animated storyline (n = 142). The HCL showed the estimated coefficients for all attributes aligned with a priori expectations and were statistically significant. The scale term was statistically significant, indicating that respondents who received plain-text materials had more random choices. Further tests suggested preference homogeneity after accounting for differences in scale.

Conclusions: Using animated training materials did not change the preferences of respondents, but they appeared to improve choice consistency, potentially allowing researchers to include more complex designs with increased numbers of attributes, levels, alternatives or choice sets.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一图胜千言:调查培训材料在国家偏好研究中的作用。
背景:基于在线调查的方法越来越多地用于引出对医疗保健的偏好。这种数字化为交互式调查元素创造了机会,有可能提高受访者的理解和/或参与度。目的:我们的目的是了解调查中的培训材料是否以及如何影响陈述的偏好。方法:设计一项在线离散选择实验(DCE),以引起公众对类风湿关节炎(RA)处方生物制剂(“生物计算器”)的新靶向方法的偏好,与传统处方相比。DCE提出了三种替代方案,两种生物计算器和一种传统方法(选择退出),用五个属性来描述:延迟治疗、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、感染风险和为国家卫生服务节省成本。受访者被随机分配接受纯文本或动画故事情节的培训材料。培训材料包含有关类风湿性关节炎的信息和治疗方法,并描述了生物计算器。背景问题包括社会人口统计学和自我报告的任务难度和属性不出席措施。DCE数据采用条件和异方差条件logit (HCL)模型进行分析。结果:共有300名受访者完成了DCE,接受了纯文本(n = 158)或动画故事情节(n = 142)。HCL显示所有属性的估计系数与先验预期一致,并且具有统计学意义。量表项有统计学意义,说明收到纯文本材料的被调查者有更多的随机选择。进一步的测试表明,在考虑尺度差异后,偏好同质性。结论:使用动画训练材料并没有改变受访者的偏好,但它们似乎提高了选择的一致性,潜在地允许研究人员加入更复杂的设计,增加属性、级别、选择或选择集的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书