How safe are hemp-based food products? A review and risk assessment of analytical data from Germany

Fabian P. Steinmetz, G. Nahler, J. C. Wakefield
{"title":"How safe are hemp-based food products? A review and risk assessment of analytical data from Germany","authors":"Fabian P. Steinmetz, G. Nahler, J. C. Wakefield","doi":"10.1108/nfs-04-2022-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nHemp-based food products and supplements have gained popularity within recent years in Europe. Apart from the non-psychoactive cannabinoid, cannabidiol, these products may also contain Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which can be of concern for safety and regulatory compliance. In the European Union, the currently accepted limit for THC in hemp is 0.3%. As many hemp-based products have been withdrawn from the German market within recent months/years, this study aims to investigate the current safety limit and potential concerns based on available analytical data.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTherefore, a publicly accessible, analytical data set from the German food authority was analysed and complemented by literature data and expert opinions regarding THC in food products. Furthermore, critical exposures have been calculated based on different product types and limits.\n\n\nFindings\nA safety-based limit of 11.9 µg/kg/day is proposed. Importantly, the authors’ examination of hemp seed oils, one of the most common food products, showed that 4 of the 102 samples were identified as having a low-to-moderate risk for inducing impairment – confirming the general need for regulation. For hemp leaf tea and common supplements, calculated exposures to THC were not considered critical. This has been also reflected by the absence of intoxication reports in the scientific literature.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhilst for most hemp-derived foods safety concerns for the general public are considered low, this may not be the case for some products, suggesting the general need for regulatory compliance. Nevertheless, a more realistic safety limit should be applied.\n","PeriodicalId":12417,"journal":{"name":"Food Science & Nutrition","volume":"455 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-04-2022-0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose Hemp-based food products and supplements have gained popularity within recent years in Europe. Apart from the non-psychoactive cannabinoid, cannabidiol, these products may also contain Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) which can be of concern for safety and regulatory compliance. In the European Union, the currently accepted limit for THC in hemp is 0.3%. As many hemp-based products have been withdrawn from the German market within recent months/years, this study aims to investigate the current safety limit and potential concerns based on available analytical data. Design/methodology/approach Therefore, a publicly accessible, analytical data set from the German food authority was analysed and complemented by literature data and expert opinions regarding THC in food products. Furthermore, critical exposures have been calculated based on different product types and limits. Findings A safety-based limit of 11.9 µg/kg/day is proposed. Importantly, the authors’ examination of hemp seed oils, one of the most common food products, showed that 4 of the 102 samples were identified as having a low-to-moderate risk for inducing impairment – confirming the general need for regulation. For hemp leaf tea and common supplements, calculated exposures to THC were not considered critical. This has been also reflected by the absence of intoxication reports in the scientific literature. Originality/value Whilst for most hemp-derived foods safety concerns for the general public are considered low, this may not be the case for some products, suggesting the general need for regulatory compliance. Nevertheless, a more realistic safety limit should be applied.
以大麻为原料的食品安全程度如何?对德国分析数据的审查和风险评估
目的近年来,以大麻为基础的食品和补充剂在欧洲越来越受欢迎。除了非精神活性大麻素,大麻二酚,这些产品还可能含有Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol(四氢大麻酚),这可能会引起安全性和法规遵从性的关注。在欧盟,目前大麻中四氢大麻酚的可接受限量为0.3%。由于最近几个月/几年内许多基于大麻的产品已从德国市场撤出,本研究旨在根据现有分析数据调查当前的安全限值和潜在问题。因此,对来自德国食品管理局的可公开访问的分析数据集进行了分析,并辅以有关食品中四氢大麻酚的文献数据和专家意见。此外,还根据不同的产品类型和限值计算了临界暴露量。研究结果提出了11.9µg/kg/day的安全限值。重要的是,作者对大麻籽油(最常见的食品之一)的检查表明,102个样本中有4个被确定为具有低至中度诱导损伤的风险,这证实了监管的普遍必要性。对于大麻叶茶和普通补充剂,计算的四氢大麻酚暴露量并不被认为是关键。这也反映在科学文献中缺乏中毒报告。原创性/价值虽然公众对大多数大麻衍生食品的安全担忧程度较低,但某些产品的情况可能并非如此,这表明一般需要遵守法规。然而,应该采用更现实的安全限度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信