Implementation of 8E Learning Cycle Model with Instagram to Overcome Student Misconceptions in Buffer Solution Material

M. Rizal, Rusmansyah Rusmansyah, Rusliana Sari
{"title":"Implementation of 8E Learning Cycle Model with Instagram to Overcome Student Misconceptions in Buffer Solution Material","authors":"M. Rizal, Rusmansyah Rusmansyah, Rusliana Sari","doi":"10.15575/jtk.v7i2.20494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the effectiveness of applying the 8E learning cycle model with Instagram to overcome student misconceptions in Buffer Solution material. In particular, this study analyzed the differences between the 8E learning cycle model and the online (conventional) expository model with Instagramin overcoming student misconceptions about buffer solution materials. This research method is a quasi-experiment with a non-equivalent control group design. Data collection used a three-tier multiple choice test technique and five experts' validated student response questionnaires. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling. Data analysis techniques use descriptive and inferential analysis of t-tests. The t-test is used to analyze the difference in concept understanding learning outcomes between the experimental and control classes to determine the effectiveness of the 8E learning cycle model. The results showed there were significant differences in concept understanding and misconceptions between experimental class students and control class students (0.00<0.05). Experimental class concept understanding was higher (43.62%) than the control class (28.95%), and experimental class misconception was lower (40.76%) than the control class (47.81%). From these data, it can be concluded that the application of the 8E learning cycle model is more effective than the expository (conventional) online model in overcoming misconceptions in buffer solution materials. The 8E learning cycle model can be an alternative to overcome misconceptions and improve students' understanding of concepts in buffer solution materials.","PeriodicalId":33527,"journal":{"name":"JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTK Jurnal Tadris Kimiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v7i2.20494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of applying the 8E learning cycle model with Instagram to overcome student misconceptions in Buffer Solution material. In particular, this study analyzed the differences between the 8E learning cycle model and the online (conventional) expository model with Instagramin overcoming student misconceptions about buffer solution materials. This research method is a quasi-experiment with a non-equivalent control group design. Data collection used a three-tier multiple choice test technique and five experts' validated student response questionnaires. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling. Data analysis techniques use descriptive and inferential analysis of t-tests. The t-test is used to analyze the difference in concept understanding learning outcomes between the experimental and control classes to determine the effectiveness of the 8E learning cycle model. The results showed there were significant differences in concept understanding and misconceptions between experimental class students and control class students (0.00<0.05). Experimental class concept understanding was higher (43.62%) than the control class (28.95%), and experimental class misconception was lower (40.76%) than the control class (47.81%). From these data, it can be concluded that the application of the 8E learning cycle model is more effective than the expository (conventional) online model in overcoming misconceptions in buffer solution materials. The 8E learning cycle model can be an alternative to overcome misconceptions and improve students' understanding of concepts in buffer solution materials.
利用Instagram实现8E学习周期模型克服学生对缓冲溶液材料的误解
本研究旨在确定应用Instagram的8E学习周期模型来克服学生对Buffer Solution材料的误解的有效性。特别地,本研究分析了8E学习周期模型与使用instagram克服学生对缓冲溶液材料误解的在线(传统)说说性模型之间的差异。本研究方法为准实验,采用非等效对照组设计。数据收集采用三层选择题测试技术和五位专家验证的学生回答问卷。抽样技术使用有目的的抽样。数据分析技术使用t检验的描述性和推断性分析。采用t检验分析实验班和控制班在概念理解学习结果上的差异,以确定8E学习周期模型的有效性。结果显示,实验班学生与对照组学生在概念理解和误解方面存在显著差异(0.00<0.05)。实验班的概念理解率(43.62%)高于对照组(28.95%),误解率(40.76%)低于对照组(47.81%)。从这些数据可以得出结论,在克服缓冲溶液材料中的误解方面,应用8E学习周期模型比说说性(传统)在线模型更有效。8E学习周期模型可以作为一种替代方法来克服误解,提高学生对缓冲溶液材料中概念的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信