‘Happeners…don’t merely dig the scene, they make it’: The Social Meaning of the Work of Art in Allan Kaprow’s Happenings

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Laura Routledge
{"title":"‘Happeners…don’t merely dig the scene, they make it’: The Social Meaning of the Work of Art in Allan Kaprow’s Happenings","authors":"Laura Routledge","doi":"10.35360/njes.617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at Allan Kaprow’s Happenings through the framework of Peter Burger’s 1971 Theory of the Avant-Garde. It suggests that Kaprow’s Happenings project can be read as a detailed investigation into the way in which the category ‘art’ was formulated in his society, and an exploration of alternative possibilities for the social meaning and function of works of art excluded by this dominant ontology. The paper focuses specifically on Kaprow’s interrogation of the dominant understanding of the relationship between the art work and the spectator in the mid-century American art world, and the alternatives to this model that his Happenings proposed. Throughout the course of the 1960s, I demonstrate, Kaprow painstakingly explored and developed these alternatives, slowly formulating a model for the social function and meaning of the category ‘art’ that decentred hegemonic ideas about artistic autonomy and sought to ‘reintegrate art into the praxis of life’ (Burger, 22).","PeriodicalId":35119,"journal":{"name":"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper looks at Allan Kaprow’s Happenings through the framework of Peter Burger’s 1971 Theory of the Avant-Garde. It suggests that Kaprow’s Happenings project can be read as a detailed investigation into the way in which the category ‘art’ was formulated in his society, and an exploration of alternative possibilities for the social meaning and function of works of art excluded by this dominant ontology. The paper focuses specifically on Kaprow’s interrogation of the dominant understanding of the relationship between the art work and the spectator in the mid-century American art world, and the alternatives to this model that his Happenings proposed. Throughout the course of the 1960s, I demonstrate, Kaprow painstakingly explored and developed these alternatives, slowly formulating a model for the social function and meaning of the category ‘art’ that decentred hegemonic ideas about artistic autonomy and sought to ‘reintegrate art into the praxis of life’ (Burger, 22).
“发生者……不只是挖掘场景,他们创造场景”:艾伦·卡普罗《发生》中艺术作品的社会意义
本文以彼得·伯格1971年的先锋派理论为框架来审视艾伦·卡普罗的《偶发》。这表明,卡普罗的“偶然事件”项目可以被解读为对“艺术”类别在他的社会中形成的方式的详细调查,以及对被这种主导本体论排除在外的艺术作品的社会意义和功能的替代可能性的探索。本文特别关注Kaprow对上世纪中叶美国艺术界对艺术作品与观众之间关系的主流理解的质疑,以及他的《Happenings》提出的这种模式的替代方案。在整个20世纪60年代,我证明,Kaprow煞费苦心地探索和发展了这些替代方案,慢慢地为“艺术”范畴的社会功能和意义制定了一个模型,该模型消除了关于艺术自治的霸权思想,并寻求“将艺术重新融入生活实践”(Burger, 22)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies
NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信