Efecto del calentamiento activo y de diferentes intervalos de recuperación sobre el rendimiento en natación

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Armando Quirós Vásquez, Elizabeth Carpio-Rivera, Walter Salazar-Rojas
{"title":"Efecto del calentamiento activo y de diferentes intervalos de recuperación sobre el rendimiento en natación","authors":"Armando Quirós Vásquez, Elizabeth Carpio-Rivera, Walter Salazar-Rojas","doi":"10.15517/pensarmov.v18i1.40846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Determine the effect of active warm-up with different recovery intervals, in freestyle swimming performance, in 50m and 200m. Methods: Seven-teen athletes (13.5 ± 2.18 years), registered with the Costa Rican Federation of Water Sports, with training and competition experience of 4.47 ± 1.28 years. Before the 50m and 200m freestyle swimming tests, four experimental conditions were carried out: 1) Control (without warmup); 2) Warm-up (960m) + 20 min rest; 3) Warm-up (960m) + 10 min rest; 4) Warm-up (960m) without rest. The order of the tests (50 m and 200 m freestyle) and the experimental conditions were randomly assigned. The statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA of repeated measures, accepting significance with p <0.05. Results: No significant difference was found between conditions before the 50m freestyle swimming test (F = 0.83, p = 0.48), nor the 200m freestyle swimming test (F = 0.88, p = 0.46). Also, there was no effect of the different recovery times on performance in both swimming tests. Different patterns of individual response to the experimental conditions were observed. Conclusion: As a group, it is not necessary to perform an active warm-up before the 50m and 200m freestyle swimming tests. However, it is justified for the coach to pay attention to the individualized response, so that he chooses the best protocol or warmup condition or not, to improve the athletic performance of his athletes.","PeriodicalId":40746,"journal":{"name":"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud","volume":"21 1","pages":"118-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v18i1.40846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Determine the effect of active warm-up with different recovery intervals, in freestyle swimming performance, in 50m and 200m. Methods: Seven-teen athletes (13.5 ± 2.18 years), registered with the Costa Rican Federation of Water Sports, with training and competition experience of 4.47 ± 1.28 years. Before the 50m and 200m freestyle swimming tests, four experimental conditions were carried out: 1) Control (without warmup); 2) Warm-up (960m) + 20 min rest; 3) Warm-up (960m) + 10 min rest; 4) Warm-up (960m) without rest. The order of the tests (50 m and 200 m freestyle) and the experimental conditions were randomly assigned. The statistical analysis was carried out using one-way ANOVA of repeated measures, accepting significance with p <0.05. Results: No significant difference was found between conditions before the 50m freestyle swimming test (F = 0.83, p = 0.48), nor the 200m freestyle swimming test (F = 0.88, p = 0.46). Also, there was no effect of the different recovery times on performance in both swimming tests. Different patterns of individual response to the experimental conditions were observed. Conclusion: As a group, it is not necessary to perform an active warm-up before the 50m and 200m freestyle swimming tests. However, it is justified for the coach to pay attention to the individualized response, so that he chooses the best protocol or warmup condition or not, to improve the athletic performance of his athletes.
主动热身和不同恢复间隔对游泳成绩的影响
目的:确定在自由泳、50米、200米比赛中,不同恢复间隔的积极热身的效果。方法:7名青少年运动员(13.5±2.18岁),在哥斯达黎加水上运动联合会注册,训练和比赛经验4.47±1.28年。在50米和200米自由泳测试前,进行了四种实验条件:1)控制(不热身);2)热身(960米)+休息20分钟;3)热身(960米)+休息10分钟;4)热身(960米),不休息。试验顺序(50米和200米自由泳)和实验条件随机分配。统计学分析采用重复测量的单因素方差分析,p <0.05为显著性。结果:50米自由泳测试前各状态间无显著差异(F = 0.83, p = 0.48), 200米自由泳测试前各状态间无显著差异(F = 0.88, p = 0.46)。此外,在两项游泳测试中,不同的恢复时间对表现没有影响。观察到个体对实验条件的不同反应模式。结论:作为一个群体,在50米和200米自由泳测试前没有必要进行积极的热身。然而,教练有理由关注个性化的反应,以便他选择最佳的方案或热身条件,以提高运动员的运动成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书