{"title":"It is useless to refrain the wave: the need for Brecht and Stanislavski in the hybridity of the epic theatrical forms of the Brazilian scene","authors":"L. Romano","doi":"10.1080/20567790.2020.1806432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article proposes to observe the relationship between the legacy of Constantin Stanislavski and Bertolt Brecht in Brazil, from the 1950s to the present, demarking the influences of both in the transformation of acting practices in the country as established from two moments: first, the construction of an inaugural epic mode of acting in the left-wing experience of the theatre company Teatro de Arena in São Paulo from 1953 to 1972; and second, the ”new” acting of performers in contemporary variations on a public, democratic, and experimental theatre in dialogue with the social and political dilemmas of Brazil, specifically in Cia Livre, Cia Bartolomeu, and Cia São Jorge. This analysis will enable us to discuss how the arrival of Brecht merged with the dissemination of Stanislavski’s newly introduced practices in the country, in a conjunction that led to the invention of a hybridized and particularly Brazilian way of acting. We will also examine how the re-emergence of a political theatre, after the slow reopening of the country in the late 1980s that succeeded the Brazilian Civilian-Military Coup in 1964, brought back the “need for Brecht” as well as the “need for Stanislavski”, both of which were embraced by the young artists of the national theatre without prejudice towards specific acting styles. Thereafter, we can glimpse contributions of what we consider to be the inherent plasticity of Brecht and Stanislavski’s legacies to the mutability of the art of acting.","PeriodicalId":40821,"journal":{"name":"Stanislavski Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":"167 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanislavski Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2020.1806432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article proposes to observe the relationship between the legacy of Constantin Stanislavski and Bertolt Brecht in Brazil, from the 1950s to the present, demarking the influences of both in the transformation of acting practices in the country as established from two moments: first, the construction of an inaugural epic mode of acting in the left-wing experience of the theatre company Teatro de Arena in São Paulo from 1953 to 1972; and second, the ”new” acting of performers in contemporary variations on a public, democratic, and experimental theatre in dialogue with the social and political dilemmas of Brazil, specifically in Cia Livre, Cia Bartolomeu, and Cia São Jorge. This analysis will enable us to discuss how the arrival of Brecht merged with the dissemination of Stanislavski’s newly introduced practices in the country, in a conjunction that led to the invention of a hybridized and particularly Brazilian way of acting. We will also examine how the re-emergence of a political theatre, after the slow reopening of the country in the late 1980s that succeeded the Brazilian Civilian-Military Coup in 1964, brought back the “need for Brecht” as well as the “need for Stanislavski”, both of which were embraced by the young artists of the national theatre without prejudice towards specific acting styles. Thereafter, we can glimpse contributions of what we consider to be the inherent plasticity of Brecht and Stanislavski’s legacies to the mutability of the art of acting.
摘要:本文拟从20世纪50年代至今,观察康斯坦丁·斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基和贝托尔特·布莱希特在巴西的遗产之间的关系,并从两个时刻确定他们对巴西表演实践转型的影响:首先,1953年至1972年,在圣保罗竞技场剧院(Teatro de Arena)的左翼经验中,首次建立了史诗般的表演模式;第二,“新”表演的表演者在当代变型的公共,民主,和实验戏剧与巴西的社会和政治困境的对话,特别是在cialivre, ciabartolomeu和cias o Jorge。这一分析将使我们能够讨论布莱希特的到来与斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基新引入的实践在巴西的传播是如何结合在一起的,这种结合导致了一种混合的、特别具有巴西特色的表演方式的发明。我们还将研究政治剧院的重新出现,在20世纪80年代末,继1964年巴西文职军事政变之后,这个国家缓慢地重新开放,带回了“对布莱希特的需要”以及“对斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的需要”,这两者都被国家剧院的年轻艺术家所接受,而对特定的表演风格没有偏见。此后,我们可以看到我们认为布莱希特和斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基遗产的内在可塑性对表演艺术的可变性的贡献。