When theory tells what is possible

J. Geneste
{"title":"When theory tells what is possible","authors":"J. Geneste","doi":"10.15406/JNMR.2018.07.00179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nobody should be shocked if we say that a human body is a system! Now, if we consider a human being as a system and therefore as a combinatorial game, we can easily assume that if the human is hit by any illness, we can assume that the illness is a player and has played the first turn. As doctors, if we want to cure the patient, we need to play in our turn and there will of course be a reaction of the illness which will be considered as another round and so on. In the end, what we target is winning the game so that the illness will lose! As an assumption we take that the illness plays the best as possible and is therefore the strongest adversary we can have. Now, we must know to which game we are going to play because depending on the game, the strategy will change and this will be, in our referential, the essential role of the doctor: which game to play to be the most efficient?","PeriodicalId":16465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nanomedicine Research","volume":"144 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nanomedicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JNMR.2018.07.00179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nobody should be shocked if we say that a human body is a system! Now, if we consider a human being as a system and therefore as a combinatorial game, we can easily assume that if the human is hit by any illness, we can assume that the illness is a player and has played the first turn. As doctors, if we want to cure the patient, we need to play in our turn and there will of course be a reaction of the illness which will be considered as another round and so on. In the end, what we target is winning the game so that the illness will lose! As an assumption we take that the illness plays the best as possible and is therefore the strongest adversary we can have. Now, we must know to which game we are going to play because depending on the game, the strategy will change and this will be, in our referential, the essential role of the doctor: which game to play to be the most efficient?
当理论告诉我们什么是可能的
如果我们说人体是一个系统,没有人会感到震惊!现在,如果我们将人类视为一个系统,因此作为一个组合游戏,我们可以很容易地假设,如果人类受到任何疾病的袭击,我们可以假设疾病是一个玩家,并且已经进行了第一轮。作为医生,如果我们想治愈病人,我们需要在我们的回合中发挥作用,当然会有疾病的反应,这将被视为另一轮等等。最后,我们的目标是赢得比赛,让疾病输掉!作为一种假设,我们认为疾病发挥得最好,因此是我们最强大的对手。现在,我们必须知道我们要玩哪一种游戏因为根据游戏的不同,策略会发生变化这将是,在我们的参考资料中,医生的基本角色:哪一种游戏最有效?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信