Environmental thinking in higher education: Towards a systemic integration

O. Blibech, A. Al-Ayash
{"title":"Environmental thinking in higher education: Towards a systemic integration","authors":"O. Blibech, A. Al-Ayash","doi":"10.1109/ETSAIDE53569.2022.9906388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research considers emerging approaches of environmental thinking in Higher Education, perceived as a need, but also as a “trend” that leads to versatile orientations impacting both educational goals and curriculum design. As Knowledge is the core of higher education, environmental thinking seems like a complex parameter when considering sustainability-based education interconnections with an inherent knowledge-based economy. Thus, exploring the principles and “models” of environmental thinking and corresponding pedagogical approaches, conceived for an intended “education for sustainability”, should be focused on the divergent intricacies related to needed implementations of linear thinking, cyclical thinking, ecological thinking, and their interrelation with the concept of sustainability and its utility and extensions in designing pedagogical contents. Moreover, observing the constraints related to the actual use of environmental thinking could lead to understanding the various facets of required interdisciplinarity when “modeling” such contents, intended to be “sustainability-centered” and every so often “environment-oriented”, considering desired breadth, assimilations, and reflections on and with other relevant contents. Therefore, systemic integration of environmental thinking as the focused approach of this research envisions the understanding of correlated processes, opportunities, and limitations. The observations of designed pedagogical “situations” and their outcomes paired with generated learning experiences within the interior design engineering programme represent the major conceptual and methodological outline. The deployed quantitative and qualitative methods allied to reflective observations investigate various aspects, indicators, processes, flows, and experiential approaches aiding to modelize a potential viable systemic integration.","PeriodicalId":70295,"journal":{"name":"建筑工程技术与设计","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"建筑工程技术与设计","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETSAIDE53569.2022.9906388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research considers emerging approaches of environmental thinking in Higher Education, perceived as a need, but also as a “trend” that leads to versatile orientations impacting both educational goals and curriculum design. As Knowledge is the core of higher education, environmental thinking seems like a complex parameter when considering sustainability-based education interconnections with an inherent knowledge-based economy. Thus, exploring the principles and “models” of environmental thinking and corresponding pedagogical approaches, conceived for an intended “education for sustainability”, should be focused on the divergent intricacies related to needed implementations of linear thinking, cyclical thinking, ecological thinking, and their interrelation with the concept of sustainability and its utility and extensions in designing pedagogical contents. Moreover, observing the constraints related to the actual use of environmental thinking could lead to understanding the various facets of required interdisciplinarity when “modeling” such contents, intended to be “sustainability-centered” and every so often “environment-oriented”, considering desired breadth, assimilations, and reflections on and with other relevant contents. Therefore, systemic integration of environmental thinking as the focused approach of this research envisions the understanding of correlated processes, opportunities, and limitations. The observations of designed pedagogical “situations” and their outcomes paired with generated learning experiences within the interior design engineering programme represent the major conceptual and methodological outline. The deployed quantitative and qualitative methods allied to reflective observations investigate various aspects, indicators, processes, flows, and experiential approaches aiding to modelize a potential viable systemic integration.
高等教育中的环境思维:走向系统整合
本研究考虑了高等教育中环境思维的新兴方法,被认为是一种需要,也是一种“趋势”,导致影响教育目标和课程设计的多种取向。由于知识是高等教育的核心,在考虑可持续教育与固有的知识经济的联系时,环境思维似乎是一个复杂的参数。因此,探索环境思维的原则和“模式”以及相应的教学方法,为预期的“可持续性教育”而设想,应该集中在与线性思维,循环思维,生态思维的需要实施相关的不同复杂性,以及它们与可持续性概念的相互关系及其在设计教学内容中的效用和扩展。此外,观察与实际使用环境思维有关的制约因素,可以在“模拟”这些旨在“以可持续发展为中心”和经常“以环境为导向”的内容时,理解所需的跨学科性的各个方面,考虑到所需的广度、同化和对其他相关内容的反思。因此,将环境思维的系统整合作为本研究的重点方法,设想了对相关过程、机会和限制的理解。对设计的教学“情境”的观察及其结果与室内设计工程项目中产生的学习经验相结合,代表了主要的概念和方法大纲。部署的定量和定性方法与反思性观察相结合,调查了各个方面、指标、过程、流程和经验方法,有助于模拟潜在的可行的系统集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
850050
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书