An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study: smear layer removal by chelat activation methods

Nga Le Thi Thu, Chi Phan Anh
{"title":"An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study: smear layer removal by chelat activation methods","authors":"Nga Le Thi Thu, Chi Phan Anh","doi":"10.34071/jmp.2022.7.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The process of mechanical root canal preparation creates smear layer. The smear layer can prevent the penetration of intracanal medicaments into dentinal tubules and influence the adaptation of filling materials to canal\nwalls. The purpose of this study is to compare the smear layer removal ability of root canal irrigation methods with chelat solution. Materials and Methods: 45 extracted human premolar roots were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15) based on root canal irrigation methods with 17% EDTA solution: (1) Conventional needle irrigation, (2) Ultrasonic activation, (3) Sonic activation. The roots were prepared with Reciproc Blue 25 file and was removed smear layer by 3 different methods of irrigation. The study sample was then sectioned longitudinally with a diamond cutting disc, randomly selecting half of the root. After undergoing sample processing, the half roots were observed and evaluated for the presence of smear layer under a scanning electron microscope with a magnification of 1000 times according to Torabinejad (2003). Results: In cervical, the average smear layer score of the 3 study groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). In the middle, apical and over the root canal, the average smear layer score of the sonic activation method was lower than that of the other 2 groups. Conclusion: Sonic irrigation is more effective in removing smear layer than conventional needle irrigation and ultrasonic irrigation activation.\nKey words: smear layer, ultrasonic, sonic.","PeriodicalId":86274,"journal":{"name":"The South Dakota journal of medicine and pharmacy","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The South Dakota journal of medicine and pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2022.7.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The process of mechanical root canal preparation creates smear layer. The smear layer can prevent the penetration of intracanal medicaments into dentinal tubules and influence the adaptation of filling materials to canal walls. The purpose of this study is to compare the smear layer removal ability of root canal irrigation methods with chelat solution. Materials and Methods: 45 extracted human premolar roots were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups (n=15) based on root canal irrigation methods with 17% EDTA solution: (1) Conventional needle irrigation, (2) Ultrasonic activation, (3) Sonic activation. The roots were prepared with Reciproc Blue 25 file and was removed smear layer by 3 different methods of irrigation. The study sample was then sectioned longitudinally with a diamond cutting disc, randomly selecting half of the root. After undergoing sample processing, the half roots were observed and evaluated for the presence of smear layer under a scanning electron microscope with a magnification of 1000 times according to Torabinejad (2003). Results: In cervical, the average smear layer score of the 3 study groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). In the middle, apical and over the root canal, the average smear layer score of the sonic activation method was lower than that of the other 2 groups. Conclusion: Sonic irrigation is more effective in removing smear layer than conventional needle irrigation and ultrasonic irrigation activation. Key words: smear layer, ultrasonic, sonic.
体外扫描电镜研究:螯合活化法去除涂抹层
背景:机械根管预备过程中会产生涂层。涂片层可以阻止管内药物渗透到牙本质小管中,影响填充材料对管壁的适应。本研究的目的是比较根管灌洗方法与螯合液对根管涂抹层的去除能力。材料与方法:选择45根拔除的人类前磨牙根,根据17% EDTA溶液根管灌洗方式随机分为3组(n=15):(1)常规针刺灌洗,(2)超声激活,(3)声波激活。用Reciproc Blue 25锉备根,用3种不同的灌洗方法去除涂抹层。研究样本然后用金刚石切割盘纵向切片,随机选择一半的根。样品处理后,根据Torabinejad(2003),在放大1000倍的扫描电子显微镜下观察和评估半根是否存在涂抹层。结果:宫颈方面,3个研究组的平均涂片层评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在根管中部、根尖和根管上方,超声激活法的平均涂片层评分低于其他2组。结论:超声灌洗对去除脏污层的效果优于常规针刺灌洗和超声激活灌洗。关键词:涂抹层,超声波,声波。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信