“Partisanship” at the Late Soviet Factory through the Prism of Andrey Alekseev's Dramatic Sociology.

O. Pinchuk
{"title":"“Partisanship” at the Late Soviet Factory through the Prism of Andrey Alekseev's Dramatic Sociology.","authors":"O. Pinchuk","doi":"10.19181/inter.2022.14.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to analyze informal practices at a late Soviet factory through the prism of the factory ethnographic project of the Soviet sociologist Andrei Alekseev, who in the 1980s. worked in the workshop of the Lenpoligraphmash plant. Based on the materials published as a result of the research project, a number of questions are raised: What is remarkable about the experience of the sociologist Andrey Alekseev? How does participant observation research help to study the organization of labor in a Soviet factory? Is it possible to say that informal practices in the work of workers were aimed only at “escaping” from the control of the factory administration, and autonomy at the workplace served solely to satisfy personal needs? The focus of the article is an informal practice, which the workshop workers called \"partisanism\" — the informal production of spare parts that are subsequently used not for personal purposes, but for the needs of production. It is argued that, firstly, contrary to the belief of researchers of Soviet labor, the ability of workers to act outside the field of view of the administration can be aimed not only at shirking and avoiding work, but also at building new ways of organizing labor, aimed, among other things, at management of collective planning obligations; secondly, Alekseev’s research project itself became “partisan”, since, on the one hand, it made it possible to explore and capture in detail the informal life of a Soviet enterprise shop in the 1980s, on the other hand, it became an alternative way to study Soviet society, a methodological and empirical initiative, an invention , but at the same time a contribution to the history of Soviet industrial sociology.","PeriodicalId":81563,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Nord","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Nord","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article attempts to analyze informal practices at a late Soviet factory through the prism of the factory ethnographic project of the Soviet sociologist Andrei Alekseev, who in the 1980s. worked in the workshop of the Lenpoligraphmash plant. Based on the materials published as a result of the research project, a number of questions are raised: What is remarkable about the experience of the sociologist Andrey Alekseev? How does participant observation research help to study the organization of labor in a Soviet factory? Is it possible to say that informal practices in the work of workers were aimed only at “escaping” from the control of the factory administration, and autonomy at the workplace served solely to satisfy personal needs? The focus of the article is an informal practice, which the workshop workers called "partisanism" — the informal production of spare parts that are subsequently used not for personal purposes, but for the needs of production. It is argued that, firstly, contrary to the belief of researchers of Soviet labor, the ability of workers to act outside the field of view of the administration can be aimed not only at shirking and avoiding work, but also at building new ways of organizing labor, aimed, among other things, at management of collective planning obligations; secondly, Alekseev’s research project itself became “partisan”, since, on the one hand, it made it possible to explore and capture in detail the informal life of a Soviet enterprise shop in the 1980s, on the other hand, it became an alternative way to study Soviet society, a methodological and empirical initiative, an invention , but at the same time a contribution to the history of Soviet industrial sociology.
安德烈·阿列克谢耶夫戏剧社会学视角下的苏联晚期工厂中的“党派关系”。
本文试图通过苏联社会学家安德烈·阿列克谢耶夫(Andrei Alekseev)在20世纪80年代的工厂民族志项目的棱镜,分析苏联一家晚期工厂的非正式做法。在lenpoligrapmash工厂的车间工作。根据研究项目发表的材料,提出了一些问题:社会学家安德烈·阿列克谢耶夫的经历有什么值得注意的?参与性观察研究如何帮助研究苏联工厂的劳动组织?有没有可能说,工人在工作中的非正式做法仅仅是为了“逃离”工厂管理的控制,而在工作场所的自治仅仅是为了满足个人需求?这篇文章的重点是一种非正式的做法,车间工人称之为“党派主义”——非正式生产的备件随后不是用于个人目的,而是用于生产的需要。有人认为,首先,与苏联劳工研究人员的观点相反,工人在行政管理范围之外行动的能力不仅可以用于逃避和逃避工作,还可以用于建立新的劳动组织方式,其目的之一是管理集体计划义务;其次,阿列克谢耶夫的研究项目本身具有“党派性”,因为一方面,它使探索和详细捕捉20世纪80年代苏联企业商店的非正式生活成为可能,另一方面,它成为研究苏联社会的另一种方式,一种方法论和经验主义的首创,一种发明,但同时也是对苏联工业社会学历史的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信