Undergraduate Interprofessional Education in the European Higher Education Area: A Systematic Review

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
V. Colonnello, Yukako Kinoshita, Nao Yoshida, Itzel Bustos Villalobos
{"title":"Undergraduate Interprofessional Education in the European Higher Education Area: A Systematic Review","authors":"V. Colonnello, Yukako Kinoshita, Nao Yoshida, Itzel Bustos Villalobos","doi":"10.3390/ime2020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As a contribution to developing interprofessional education (IPE) synergy between medical education systems in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), this review aims to describe the IPE experiences for undergraduate medical students implemented in EHEA member countries. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted on SCOUPS and MEDLINE databases. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed English language articles about undergraduate medical students, interprofessional education, and EHEA countries, published January 2000–September 2022. Results: The 32 included studies were from 14 of the 49 EHEA countries. In most of the studies, the theoretical background leading the intervention was not reported (n = 25), and in several studies (n = 16) the students were from two professions only. The reported outcomes were related to self-assessment knowledge about IPE and satisfaction about the program. In 24 studies, the assessment was based on the study’s ad hoc measures only. Limitations ranged from selection bias to lack of objective measures. Conclusion: Future directions should envision developing IPE among EHEA countries, including agreement and consistency across EHEA countries in reporting theories, educational methods, and standardized IPE evaluation measures.","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ime2020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As a contribution to developing interprofessional education (IPE) synergy between medical education systems in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), this review aims to describe the IPE experiences for undergraduate medical students implemented in EHEA member countries. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was conducted on SCOUPS and MEDLINE databases. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed English language articles about undergraduate medical students, interprofessional education, and EHEA countries, published January 2000–September 2022. Results: The 32 included studies were from 14 of the 49 EHEA countries. In most of the studies, the theoretical background leading the intervention was not reported (n = 25), and in several studies (n = 16) the students were from two professions only. The reported outcomes were related to self-assessment knowledge about IPE and satisfaction about the program. In 24 studies, the assessment was based on the study’s ad hoc measures only. Limitations ranged from selection bias to lack of objective measures. Conclusion: Future directions should envision developing IPE among EHEA countries, including agreement and consistency across EHEA countries in reporting theories, educational methods, and standardized IPE evaluation measures.
欧洲高等教育区的本科跨专业教育:系统回顾
背景:为促进欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)医学教育系统间跨专业教育(IPE)的协同发展,本综述旨在描述欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)成员国医本科生跨专业教育的实施经验。方法:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。检索在SCOUPS和MEDLINE数据库中进行。纳入标准是同行评议的关于医科本科生、跨专业教育和EHEA国家的英文文章,发表于2000年1月至2022年9月。结果:纳入的32项研究来自49个EHEA国家中的14个。在大多数研究中,没有报告导致干预的理论背景(n = 25),在一些研究中(n = 16),学生只来自两个专业。报告的结果与自我评估的IPE知识和对项目的满意度有关。在24项研究中,评估仅基于该研究的特别措施。局限性包括选择偏差和缺乏客观测量。结论:未来的发展方向应该是在EHEA国家之间发展IPE,包括EHEA国家在报告理论、教育方法和标准化的IPE评估措施方面的一致性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信