Co-tutorship process with high-risk children: an evaluation of the Rede Mãe Paranaense

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Bianca Machado Cruz Shibukawa, Camila Moraes Garollo Piran, Claudiana Ribeiro da Silva Araújo, Marcela Demitto Furtado, Maria de Fátima Garcia Lopes Merino, Ieda Harumi Higarashi
{"title":"Co-tutorship process with high-risk children: an evaluation of the Rede Mãe Paranaense","authors":"Bianca Machado Cruz Shibukawa, Camila Moraes Garollo Piran, Claudiana Ribeiro da Silva Araújo, Marcela Demitto Furtado, Maria de Fátima Garcia Lopes Merino, Ieda Harumi Higarashi","doi":"10.15253/2175-6783.20222380702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to understand how the co-tutorship between primary health care and the referral outpatient clinic from the Mother Network from Paraná (Rede Mãe Paranaense) in the follow up of high-risk children. Methods: qualitative study carried out by understanding the process of co-tutorship between primary health care and the referral outpatient clinic of the Stork Network (Rede Cegonha) in the follow up of high-risk children. The study included 28 coordinators of primary health care and two representatives of the high-risk clinic. Data collection was carried out through interviews that were transcribed and underwent thematic category analysis according with Bardin's principles. Results: data analysis led to the creation of the category Communication between primary health care and outpatient clinics: outcomes of the (dis)continuity of care to high-risk children. It became clear that the process of co-tutorship has weaknesses that prevent the provision of integral care. Conclusion: fragmented communication and lack of alignment between the services, in addition to not acting like co-tutors as they provide care to children and their families lead to shortcomings in the attention provided. Contributions to practice: the study allowed for the identification of weaknesses that can be crucial for future interventions in the high risk childcare network.","PeriodicalId":45440,"journal":{"name":"Rev Rene","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rev Rene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15253/2175-6783.20222380702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to understand how the co-tutorship between primary health care and the referral outpatient clinic from the Mother Network from Paraná (Rede Mãe Paranaense) in the follow up of high-risk children. Methods: qualitative study carried out by understanding the process of co-tutorship between primary health care and the referral outpatient clinic of the Stork Network (Rede Cegonha) in the follow up of high-risk children. The study included 28 coordinators of primary health care and two representatives of the high-risk clinic. Data collection was carried out through interviews that were transcribed and underwent thematic category analysis according with Bardin's principles. Results: data analysis led to the creation of the category Communication between primary health care and outpatient clinics: outcomes of the (dis)continuity of care to high-risk children. It became clear that the process of co-tutorship has weaknesses that prevent the provision of integral care. Conclusion: fragmented communication and lack of alignment between the services, in addition to not acting like co-tutors as they provide care to children and their families lead to shortcomings in the attention provided. Contributions to practice: the study allowed for the identification of weaknesses that can be crucial for future interventions in the high risk childcare network.
高风险儿童的共同辅导过程:对Rede mere Paranaense的评估
目的:了解基层卫生保健机构与“帕拉那母亲网络”(Rede m e Paranaense)转诊门诊共同指导高危儿童随访的效果。方法:通过了解初级卫生保健与鹳网转诊门诊在高危儿童随访中的协同辅导过程,进行质性研究。这项研究包括28名初级保健协调员和两名高风险诊所的代表。数据收集通过采访进行转录,并根据巴尔丁的原则进行专题分类分析。结果:数据分析导致创建了“初级保健和门诊诊所之间的交流:对高危儿童(不)持续护理的结果”这一类别。很明显,共同辅导的过程有缺点,妨碍提供全面的照顾。结论:这些服务之间的沟通支离破碎,缺乏一致性,而且在照顾儿童及其家庭时没有发挥共同导师的作用,导致所提供的关注存在缺陷。对实践的贡献:该研究允许识别对高风险儿童保育网络未来干预措施至关重要的弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rev Rene
Rev Rene NURSING-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信