Biomolecular Features of COVID-19 in Hodeidah, Yemen

Mohammed Amood Al Kamarany, Tarik Abdulkarim, Mahfouz Nasser
{"title":"Biomolecular Features of COVID-19 in Hodeidah, Yemen","authors":"Mohammed Amood Al Kamarany, Tarik Abdulkarim, Mahfouz Nasser","doi":"10.9734/ajbgmb/2023/v14i3317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The biomolecular technique namely Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is very important in confirmation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but in progressive infection and predication of the illness severity is not used. \nObjective: Therefore, the study aimed to determine the relationship between the viral load of COVID-19 infection and the severity of illness based on cycle threshold (Ct). \nMethodology: The research was designed in a case series study. The study included 60 patients that were confirmed by the RT-PCR test with COVID-19 and divided into two major groups. The first major group was mild and moderate cases (n:20)  that were treated at home (outpatient) and the second major group was severe and critical cases (n:40) that were treated in the isolation center (inpatient). \nResults: The results showed no relationship between the viral load and severity of illness, where the minimum Ct was 14, and the maximum Ct was 36. The mean of  Ct was  22 ± 7. On the other hand, the low Ct (high viral load) was reported in early detection cases.  In addition , 60%  (36 cases) of patients had low Ct (high viral  load ;  Ct ≤ 15  and ≤ 25  ) 40% of patients (24 cases)  had high Ct (low viral load ; Ct ≤ 26  and ≤ 39 ) that was more  than 25 Ct and less than 39 cycles . On the other mean , 95 % of first group cases (mild and moderate cases )  had high viral load  based on Ct -values  and 42.5 % of second group (severe and critical) had low viral load based on Ct -values. On the other hand, kinetic of viral load–based Ct where the viral load was reported in the first week as very high (low Ct 21) with a longitudinal assessment of RT-PCR test results in individuals requiring third –fourth weeks to clear COVID-19  RNA showed a significant reduction of the viral load in samples  (Ct values > 30).      \nConclusion: The study concluded that several factors can affect the Ct of RT-PCR (onset date, collection technique, type of swab, sampling method). Briefly, the COVID-19 RT-PCR test cannot be used as a predictor of the severity of illness.","PeriodicalId":8498,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajbgmb/2023/v14i3317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The biomolecular technique namely Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is very important in confirmation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) but in progressive infection and predication of the illness severity is not used. Objective: Therefore, the study aimed to determine the relationship between the viral load of COVID-19 infection and the severity of illness based on cycle threshold (Ct). Methodology: The research was designed in a case series study. The study included 60 patients that were confirmed by the RT-PCR test with COVID-19 and divided into two major groups. The first major group was mild and moderate cases (n:20)  that were treated at home (outpatient) and the second major group was severe and critical cases (n:40) that were treated in the isolation center (inpatient). Results: The results showed no relationship between the viral load and severity of illness, where the minimum Ct was 14, and the maximum Ct was 36. The mean of  Ct was  22 ± 7. On the other hand, the low Ct (high viral load) was reported in early detection cases.  In addition , 60%  (36 cases) of patients had low Ct (high viral  load ;  Ct ≤ 15  and ≤ 25  ) 40% of patients (24 cases)  had high Ct (low viral load ; Ct ≤ 26  and ≤ 39 ) that was more  than 25 Ct and less than 39 cycles . On the other mean , 95 % of first group cases (mild and moderate cases )  had high viral load  based on Ct -values  and 42.5 % of second group (severe and critical) had low viral load based on Ct -values. On the other hand, kinetic of viral load–based Ct where the viral load was reported in the first week as very high (low Ct 21) with a longitudinal assessment of RT-PCR test results in individuals requiring third –fourth weeks to clear COVID-19  RNA showed a significant reduction of the viral load in samples  (Ct values > 30).      Conclusion: The study concluded that several factors can affect the Ct of RT-PCR (onset date, collection technique, type of swab, sampling method). Briefly, the COVID-19 RT-PCR test cannot be used as a predictor of the severity of illness.
也门荷台达地区COVID-19的生物分子特征
背景:实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)生物分子技术在新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的确诊中非常重要,但在进展性感染和病情严重程度预测中应用较少。因此,本研究旨在基于周期阈值(Ct)确定COVID-19感染病毒载量与病情严重程度的关系。研究方法:本研究采用案例系列研究。该研究将经RT-PCR检测确诊的60名患者分为两组。第一大组是在家(门诊)治疗的轻中度病例(20例),第二大组是在隔离中心(住院)治疗的重症和危重症病例(40例)。结果:结果显示病毒载量与疾病严重程度之间没有关系,最小Ct为14,最大Ct为36。Ct平均值为22±7。另一方面,低Ct(高病毒载量)在早期发现病例中被报道。此外,60%(36例)的患者有低Ct(高病毒载量;Ct≤15和≤25)40%的患者(24例)有高Ct(低病毒载量;Ct≤26和≤39)大于25 Ct且小于39 cycles。另一方面,95%的第一组病例(轻度和中度病例)具有基于Ct值的高病毒载量,而42.5%的第二组病例(严重和危急)具有基于Ct值的低病毒载量。另一方面,在第一周报告的病毒载量非常高(低Ct 21)的情况下,基于病毒载量的Ct动态,对需要第三至第四周清除COVID-19 RNA的个体的RT-PCR检测结果进行纵向评估,显示样品中的病毒载量显著降低(Ct值> 30)。结论:影响RT-PCR Ct的因素有发病日期、采集技术、拭子类型、取样方法等。简而言之,COVID-19 RT-PCR检测不能用作疾病严重程度的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信