Inflammation markers in virologically suppressed HIV-Infected patients after switching to dolutegravir plus lamivudine vs continuing triple therapy: 48-week results in real-life setting

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
F. Lombardi, S. Belmonti, D. Moschese, M. Fabbiani, A. Borghetti, A. Ciccullo, E. Visconti, S. Di Giambenedetto
{"title":"Inflammation markers in virologically suppressed HIV-Infected patients after switching to dolutegravir plus lamivudine vs continuing triple therapy: 48-week results in real-life setting","authors":"F. Lombardi, S. Belmonti, D. Moschese, M. Fabbiani, A. Borghetti, A. Ciccullo, E. Visconti, S. Di Giambenedetto","doi":"10.1080/25787489.2022.2080625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a treatment switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine on the soluble inflammatory biomarkers of HIV-infected patients treated in a real-life setting. Materials and methods: This was a longitudinal study that enrolled virologically-suppressed patients on stable 3-drug ART who switched at baseline to dolutegravir + lamivudine (2DR-group), based on the clinician’s decision, or maintained triple therapy (3DR-group). Subjects in the 3DR-group were matched with those in the 2DR-group for age, gender and type of anchor drug. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), I-FABP, D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified by a microfluidic ultrasensitive ELISA assay at baseline and at 48 weeks. Results: Overall 208 subjects were enrolled: 101 in the 2DR-group and 107 in the 3DR-group. At baseline, biomarker levels were comparable between groups. The differences in mean log10 change from baseline to 48 weeks between groups (2DR versus 3DR) were: IL-6 (pg/L) −0.051(95% CI −0.115/0.009) versus 0.004 (95% CI −0.046/0.054) (p = 0.159); I-FABP (pg/mL), −0.088 (95% CI −0.14/-0.041) versus 0.033 (95%CI −0.007/0.072) (p < 0.001); D-dimer (pg/mL), −0.011(95% CI-0.055/0.033) versus −0.021 (95% CI −0.071/0.030) (p = 0.780) and CRP (pg/mL), −0.028 (95%CI −0.118/0.063) versus 0.118 (95% CI 0.024/0.211) (p = 0.028). Conclusions: At 1 year, switching to a dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual regimen in this setting showed a favorable trend for two biomarkers analyzed, i.e., I-FABP and CRP, as compared to continuing a triple therapy. These results add important new data in support of the safety of this approach in terms of its effect on the inflammatory milieu.","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"117 1","pages":"28 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2022.2080625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a treatment switch to dolutegravir plus lamivudine on the soluble inflammatory biomarkers of HIV-infected patients treated in a real-life setting. Materials and methods: This was a longitudinal study that enrolled virologically-suppressed patients on stable 3-drug ART who switched at baseline to dolutegravir + lamivudine (2DR-group), based on the clinician’s decision, or maintained triple therapy (3DR-group). Subjects in the 3DR-group were matched with those in the 2DR-group for age, gender and type of anchor drug. Plasma levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), I-FABP, D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) were quantified by a microfluidic ultrasensitive ELISA assay at baseline and at 48 weeks. Results: Overall 208 subjects were enrolled: 101 in the 2DR-group and 107 in the 3DR-group. At baseline, biomarker levels were comparable between groups. The differences in mean log10 change from baseline to 48 weeks between groups (2DR versus 3DR) were: IL-6 (pg/L) −0.051(95% CI −0.115/0.009) versus 0.004 (95% CI −0.046/0.054) (p = 0.159); I-FABP (pg/mL), −0.088 (95% CI −0.14/-0.041) versus 0.033 (95%CI −0.007/0.072) (p < 0.001); D-dimer (pg/mL), −0.011(95% CI-0.055/0.033) versus −0.021 (95% CI −0.071/0.030) (p = 0.780) and CRP (pg/mL), −0.028 (95%CI −0.118/0.063) versus 0.118 (95% CI 0.024/0.211) (p = 0.028). Conclusions: At 1 year, switching to a dolutegravir plus lamivudine dual regimen in this setting showed a favorable trend for two biomarkers analyzed, i.e., I-FABP and CRP, as compared to continuing a triple therapy. These results add important new data in support of the safety of this approach in terms of its effect on the inflammatory milieu.
在改用多替格拉韦加拉米夫定与继续三联治疗后,病毒学抑制的hiv感染患者的炎症标志物:在现实环境中48周的结果
目的:评估在现实环境中,治疗切换到多替格拉韦加拉米夫定对hiv感染患者可溶性炎症生物标志物的影响。材料和方法:这是一项纵向研究,纳入了病毒学抑制的患者,他们在基线时根据临床医生的决定切换到多替格拉韦+拉米夫定(2dr组),或维持三联治疗(3dr组)。3dr组受试者与2dr组受试者在年龄、性别和锚药类型上进行匹配。在基线和48周时,采用微流体超灵敏ELISA法测定血浆白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、I-FABP、d -二聚体和c -反应蛋白(CRP)水平。结果:共入组208例,2dr组101例,3dr组107例。在基线时,两组之间的生物标志物水平具有可比性。两组(2DR vs 3DR)从基线到48周的平均log10变化差异为:IL-6 (pg/L) - 0.051(95% CI - 0.115/0.009) vs . 0.004 (95% CI - 0.046/0.054) (p = 0.159);I-FABP (pg / mL),−0.088 (95% CI−0.14/-0.041)和0.033(95%可信区间−0.007/0.072)(p < 0.001);肺动脉栓塞(pg / mL)−0.011 (95% CI - 0.055/0.033)与−0.021 (95% CI−0.071/0.030)(p = 0.780)和c反应蛋白(pg / mL)−0.028 (95% CI−0.118/0.063)和0.118(95%可信区间0.024/0.211)(p = 0.028)。结论:在1年时,与继续三联治疗相比,在这种情况下切换到多替格拉韦加拉米夫定的双重治疗方案,分析了两种生物标志物,即I-FABP和CRP的有利趋势。这些结果增加了重要的新数据,支持这种方法对炎症环境的影响的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信