Acute coronary syndrome in patients with aortic valve stenosis

M. Mukanova, F. Kopylov, R. Komarov, I. I. Serebrennikov, F. S. Gafurov, A. N. Khuziakhmedov, N. Babakulova, A. Ismailbaev
{"title":"Acute coronary syndrome in patients with aortic valve stenosis","authors":"M. Mukanova, F. Kopylov, R. Komarov, I. I. Serebrennikov, F. S. Gafurov, A. N. Khuziakhmedov, N. Babakulova, A. Ismailbaev","doi":"10.32000/2072-1757-2023-2-73-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose — to assess the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) clinical aspects in patients with aortic stenosis. Material and methods. This is a retrospective single-center study that included comparison of hospital and midterm outcomes of ACS and aortic stenosis (n = 95, divided into the following groups: group 1 — severe aortic stenosis + ACS (n = 39); group 2 — moderate aortic stenosis + ACS (n = 28); group 3 — ACS without aortic stenosis (the control group selected using «Propensity matching» method) (n = 28)). Results. Hospital mortality did not differ statistically between the groups. In group 1, there was a tendency to worse survival within 1 year. In groups with aortic malformation, ACS with ST segment elevation was less common — p = 0.0002 and p = 0.001, respectively. In group 1, 23.1% of patients had intact coronary arteries. Conclusions. Severe aortic valve stenosis in some cases «mimics» acute coronary syndrome, which is indicated by significantly more frequent detection of intact coronary arteries in this cohort. Aortic stenosis of varying degrees does not lead to an increase in the frequency of early postoperative complications and 30-day mortality after PCI.","PeriodicalId":9821,"journal":{"name":"中国实用医药","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实用医药","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32000/2072-1757-2023-2-73-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose — to assess the acute coronary syndrome (ACS) clinical aspects in patients with aortic stenosis. Material and methods. This is a retrospective single-center study that included comparison of hospital and midterm outcomes of ACS and aortic stenosis (n = 95, divided into the following groups: group 1 — severe aortic stenosis + ACS (n = 39); group 2 — moderate aortic stenosis + ACS (n = 28); group 3 — ACS without aortic stenosis (the control group selected using «Propensity matching» method) (n = 28)). Results. Hospital mortality did not differ statistically between the groups. In group 1, there was a tendency to worse survival within 1 year. In groups with aortic malformation, ACS with ST segment elevation was less common — p = 0.0002 and p = 0.001, respectively. In group 1, 23.1% of patients had intact coronary arteries. Conclusions. Severe aortic valve stenosis in some cases «mimics» acute coronary syndrome, which is indicated by significantly more frequent detection of intact coronary arteries in this cohort. Aortic stenosis of varying degrees does not lead to an increase in the frequency of early postoperative complications and 30-day mortality after PCI.
主动脉瓣狭窄患者的急性冠状动脉综合征
目的:探讨主动脉瓣狭窄患者急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的临床特点。材料和方法。这是一项回顾性单中心研究,包括ACS和主动脉狭窄的医院和中期结局的比较(n = 95,分为以下组:1组-严重主动脉狭窄+ ACS (n = 39);2组-中度主动脉狭窄+ ACS (n = 28);3组- ACS无主动脉瓣狭窄(采用«倾向匹配»方法选择的对照组)(n = 28)。结果。两组之间的住院死亡率没有统计学差异。1组患者1年内生存率有下降趋势。在主动脉畸形组,ST段抬高的ACS发生率较低,分别为p = 0.0002和p = 0.001。在第1组,23.1%的患者冠状动脉完整。结论。在一些病例中,严重的主动脉瓣狭窄“类似”急性冠状动脉综合征,这表明在这个队列中,完整冠状动脉的检测明显更频繁。不同程度的主动脉狭窄并不会导致PCI术后早期并发症和30天死亡率的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92358
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信