Diverse Perspectives to Support a Human Rights Approach to Reduce Indiana’s Maternal Mortality Rate

Amelia E Clark, Erin Macey, Ashley Irby, C. Stone, Mary Pell Abernathy, J. Turman
{"title":"Diverse Perspectives to Support a Human Rights Approach to Reduce Indiana’s Maternal Mortality Rate","authors":"Amelia E Clark, Erin Macey, Ashley Irby, C. Stone, Mary Pell Abernathy, J. Turman","doi":"10.1177/01605976221109785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maternal mortality in the United States of America is a human rights issue. This study gathered perspectives from Black women community members and from duty bearers in four fields (academic, special interest, government, and media) on barriers to maternal health in Indiana. Semi-structured interviews and an editing (data-based) analytic strategy revealed six themes regarding barriers to maternal health: lack of continuous, quality health care coverage; racism and implicit bias; trauma and lack of mental health services; lack of instrumental and emotional support systems; insufficient knowledge for self-advocacy; and lack of data transparency and reliability. Participants raised several strategies to address barriers, including continuous high-quality health care coverage, implicit bias training, mental health services, doulas, and grassroots-university partnerships. We discuss these barriers and solutions using a human rights-based approach to health (HRBA). These findings present a blueprint for duty bearers in Indiana to increase women’s ability to claim their right to health.","PeriodicalId":81481,"journal":{"name":"Humanity & society","volume":"10 1","pages":"69 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanity & society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01605976221109785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Maternal mortality in the United States of America is a human rights issue. This study gathered perspectives from Black women community members and from duty bearers in four fields (academic, special interest, government, and media) on barriers to maternal health in Indiana. Semi-structured interviews and an editing (data-based) analytic strategy revealed six themes regarding barriers to maternal health: lack of continuous, quality health care coverage; racism and implicit bias; trauma and lack of mental health services; lack of instrumental and emotional support systems; insufficient knowledge for self-advocacy; and lack of data transparency and reliability. Participants raised several strategies to address barriers, including continuous high-quality health care coverage, implicit bias training, mental health services, doulas, and grassroots-university partnerships. We discuss these barriers and solutions using a human rights-based approach to health (HRBA). These findings present a blueprint for duty bearers in Indiana to increase women’s ability to claim their right to health.
支持以人权方式降低印第安纳州孕产妇死亡率的多种观点
在美利坚合众国,产妇死亡率是一个人权问题。本研究收集了印第安纳州黑人妇女社区成员和四个领域(学术、特殊利益、政府和媒体)的责任承受者对孕产妇健康障碍的看法。半结构化访谈和编辑(基于数据的)分析战略揭示了有关孕产妇保健障碍的六个主题:缺乏持续、高质量的保健覆盖;种族主义和隐性偏见;创伤和缺乏精神卫生服务;缺乏工具和情感支持系统;缺乏自我宣传的知识;数据缺乏透明度和可靠性。与会者提出了若干消除障碍的战略,包括持续的高质量卫生保健覆盖、隐性偏见培训、精神卫生服务、助产师以及基层与大学的伙伴关系。我们采用基于人权的健康方针(HRBA)讨论这些障碍和解决办法。这些调查结果为印第安纳州的责任承担者提供了蓝图,以提高妇女主张其健康权的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信