Ethics & Governance of Research: Focus on Research Ethics Committees globally, disparities across regions and the understanding of the structures and systems in place for publicly available information

IF 0.4 4区 哲学
Anthi Tzermpinou
{"title":"Ethics & Governance of Research: Focus on Research Ethics Committees globally, disparities across regions and the understanding of the structures and systems in place for publicly available information","authors":"Anthi Tzermpinou","doi":"10.12681/bioeth.34072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This publication presents the findings of the Research submitted for the degree of MRes in Bioeconomy Biotechnology & Law that was conducted in May 2022 at the International Hellenic university in Thessaloniki, Greece. The original research purpose was to gather information on the coherence or disparities that exist in the current environment within the established ethics committees on the country or regional level. Several elements were taken into consideration on their structural systems in place in terms of: governance, standard operating procedures, trainings, and reporting systems (internal but as well as external)] but the outcome of this research serves also as a baseline as “the outcome of a person’s understanding (author) on the current environment based on publicly available information” to reach to the desired result which is to establish a clear understanding on the current procedures of the ethics committees from a person without extensive knowledge or constant exposure to their inner environment. Therefore, there are two elements that were simultaneously under research. \nThis article presents the results based on the findings of this research but as well the barriers (limitations and restraints) contributing to their understanding. The author provides closing recommendations on the organizational level but as well on a fundamental level to provide alignment but as well as a request for clarity on the existing publicly available information in a manner that is easy to understand to the simple reader which contributes to transparency on research.","PeriodicalId":49112,"journal":{"name":"Acta Bioethica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Bioethica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/bioeth.34072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This publication presents the findings of the Research submitted for the degree of MRes in Bioeconomy Biotechnology & Law that was conducted in May 2022 at the International Hellenic university in Thessaloniki, Greece. The original research purpose was to gather information on the coherence or disparities that exist in the current environment within the established ethics committees on the country or regional level. Several elements were taken into consideration on their structural systems in place in terms of: governance, standard operating procedures, trainings, and reporting systems (internal but as well as external)] but the outcome of this research serves also as a baseline as “the outcome of a person’s understanding (author) on the current environment based on publicly available information” to reach to the desired result which is to establish a clear understanding on the current procedures of the ethics committees from a person without extensive knowledge or constant exposure to their inner environment. Therefore, there are two elements that were simultaneously under research. This article presents the results based on the findings of this research but as well the barriers (limitations and restraints) contributing to their understanding. The author provides closing recommendations on the organizational level but as well on a fundamental level to provide alignment but as well as a request for clarity on the existing publicly available information in a manner that is easy to understand to the simple reader which contributes to transparency on research.
研究伦理与治理:关注全球的研究伦理委员会、地区之间的差异以及对现有公开信息的结构和系统的理解
本出版物介绍了2022年5月在希腊塞萨洛尼基国际希腊大学为生物经济、生物技术和法律硕士学位提交的研究结果。最初的研究目的是在国家或区域一级的既定伦理委员会内收集关于当前环境中存在的一致性或差异的资料。他们的结构体系考虑了以下几个因素:治理、标准操作程序、培训、和报告系统(内部但也包括外部)],但本研究的结果也可以作为一个基线,作为“一个人(作者)基于公开信息对当前环境的理解的结果”,以达到预期的结果,即从一个没有广泛知识或经常接触其内部环境的人那里建立对伦理委员会当前程序的清晰理解。因此,有两个因素同时在研究中。本文介绍了基于该研究结果的结果,以及有助于理解的障碍(限制和约束)。作者在组织层面提供了结束语建议,但也在基本层面提供了一致性,同时要求以简单读者易于理解的方式澄清现有的公开信息,这有助于提高研究的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Bioethica
Acta Bioethica 医学-卫生政策
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Acta Bioethica is a biannual publication by the Interdisciplinary Center for Studies in Bioethics of the University of Chile (ISSN 0717-5906, press edition, y 1726-569-X, electronic edition), which publishes in three languages: Spanish, English and Portuguese. Indexed in Science Citation Index (SCI), Scopus, Lilacs, SciELO y Latindex, and in database from several Institutions; it constitutes a pluralistic source of perspectives and an important tribune which accepts the contributions of authors compromised with the interdisciplinary study of ethical determinants and consequences of techno scientific research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信