COMUNICACIÓN ACADÉMICA Y BUSCADORES CIENTÍFICOS: ‘SCOPING REVIEW’

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-15 DOI:10.33732/ixc/13/01comun2

Elena Pastor-Ramon, Cristòfol Rovira

{"title":"COMUNICACIÓN ACADÉMICA Y BUSCADORES CIENTÍFICOS: ‘SCOPING REVIEW’","authors":"Elena Pastor-Ramon, Cristòfol Rovira","doi":"10.33732/ixc/13/01comun2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To enable scientific development, research must be communicated. Scholarly communication has evolved over the years, but not the way how researchers have to justify their scientific output. This scoping review aims to describe the situation of the main scientific search engines Web of Science and Scopus, which are based on their own journal collections, and others based on citation web searches such as Google Scholar, Dimensions, and The Lens. A bibliographic search was carried out in the Lista, WoS, and Scopus databases for scientific articles dealing with scholarly communication and focusing on the resources analyzed. The search was limited to the years 2016-2021 and to the languages Spanish, English, Catalan, French, Italian and Portuguese. Bibliographic databases such as WoS and Scopus continue giving a biased picture of the influence of research, and web-based tools, such as GS and Dimensions, are resources that still have many shortcomings for not allowing the replication of searches or downloading of data, e.g., by GS. It is therefore recommended to use as much information as possible to have a more complete picture of the care received.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/13/01comun2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

To enable scientific development, research must be communicated. Scholarly communication has evolved over the years, but not the way how researchers have to justify their scientific output. This scoping review aims to describe the situation of the main scientific search engines Web of Science and Scopus, which are based on their own journal collections, and others based on citation web searches such as Google Scholar, Dimensions, and The Lens. A bibliographic search was carried out in the Lista, WoS, and Scopus databases for scientific articles dealing with scholarly communication and focusing on the resources analyzed. The search was limited to the years 2016-2021 and to the languages Spanish, English, Catalan, French, Italian and Portuguese. Bibliographic databases such as WoS and Scopus continue giving a biased picture of the influence of research, and web-based tools, such as GS and Dimensions, are resources that still have many shortcomings for not allowing the replication of searches or downloading of data, e.g., by GS. It is therefore recommended to use as much information as possible to have a more complete picture of the care received.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学术交流与科学搜索:“SCOPING REVIEW”

为了促进科学发展，研究必须传播。学术交流多年来一直在发展，但研究人员证明其科学成果的方式却没有改变。本综述的目的是描述主要的科学搜索引擎Web of Science和Scopus的情况，它们基于自己的期刊集，而其他的则基于引用网络搜索，如谷歌Scholar、Dimensions和the Lens。在Lista、WoS和Scopus数据库中对涉及学术交流的科学文章进行书目检索，重点分析资源。搜索仅限于2016-2021年，语言包括西班牙语、英语、加泰罗尼亚语、法语、意大利语和葡萄牙语。WoS和Scopus等书目数据库继续对研究的影响给出有偏见的描述，而基于网络的工具，如GS和Dimensions，仍然存在许多缺点，不允许复制搜索或下载数据，例如通过GS。因此，建议使用尽可能多的信息来更全面地了解所接受的护理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.