Cochlear Synaptopathy Following Noise Exposure in Guinea Pigs: Its Electrophysiological and Histological Assessments

IF 0.9 Q4 ACOUSTICS
Parvane Mahdi, A. Pourbakht, V. Mahabadi, A. Yazdi, M. Anari, M. Kamali
{"title":"Cochlear Synaptopathy Following Noise Exposure in Guinea Pigs:\nIts Electrophysiological and Histological Assessments","authors":"Parvane Mahdi, A. Pourbakht, V. Mahabadi, A. Yazdi, M. Anari, M. Kamali","doi":"10.32604/sv.2020.09880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exposure to high level of noise, may cause the permanent cochlear synaptic degeneration. In present study, a model of noise induced cochlear synaptopathy was established and the electrophysiological and histological metrics for its assessment was designed. 6 guinea pigs were subjected to a synaptopathic noise (octave band of 4 kHz at 104 dB SPL, for 2-h). The amplitude growth curve of Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) wave-I and wave-III latency shift in presence of noise were calculated. These indexes were considered in pre-exposure, 1 day post exposure (1DPE), 1 week post exposure (1WPE) and 1 month post exposure (1MPE) to noise. Finally, the samples were histologically analyzed. ABR wave-I amplitude was different between pre and 1DPE (p-value ≤ 0.05). However, at 1WPE, it was recovered at low intensities but at 70 dB SPL and above, the differences persisted even till 1MPE. In masked ABR, the latency shift of wave-III was different between pre and 3 post exposure assessments (p-value ≤ 0.05). Electro-microscopic analysis confirmed the synaptic degeneration, as the ribbons were larger than normal, hollow inside, and spherical and irregular in shape, also, the post synaptic density was abnormally thick and missed its flat orientation. These data revealed that noise at level below that can produce permanent hearing loss, can incur synaptic injury. So, noise is considered to be more damaging than previously thought. Accordingly, designing tools for clinical assessment of synaptopathy is beneficial in comprehensive auditory evaluation of those with history of noise exposure and also in hearing protection planning.","PeriodicalId":49496,"journal":{"name":"Sound and Vibration","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sound and Vibration","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32604/sv.2020.09880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to high level of noise, may cause the permanent cochlear synaptic degeneration. In present study, a model of noise induced cochlear synaptopathy was established and the electrophysiological and histological metrics for its assessment was designed. 6 guinea pigs were subjected to a synaptopathic noise (octave band of 4 kHz at 104 dB SPL, for 2-h). The amplitude growth curve of Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) wave-I and wave-III latency shift in presence of noise were calculated. These indexes were considered in pre-exposure, 1 day post exposure (1DPE), 1 week post exposure (1WPE) and 1 month post exposure (1MPE) to noise. Finally, the samples were histologically analyzed. ABR wave-I amplitude was different between pre and 1DPE (p-value ≤ 0.05). However, at 1WPE, it was recovered at low intensities but at 70 dB SPL and above, the differences persisted even till 1MPE. In masked ABR, the latency shift of wave-III was different between pre and 3 post exposure assessments (p-value ≤ 0.05). Electro-microscopic analysis confirmed the synaptic degeneration, as the ribbons were larger than normal, hollow inside, and spherical and irregular in shape, also, the post synaptic density was abnormally thick and missed its flat orientation. These data revealed that noise at level below that can produce permanent hearing loss, can incur synaptic injury. So, noise is considered to be more damaging than previously thought. Accordingly, designing tools for clinical assessment of synaptopathy is beneficial in comprehensive auditory evaluation of those with history of noise exposure and also in hearing protection planning.
豚鼠噪声暴露后的耳蜗突触病变:电生理和组织学评估
暴露在高水平的噪音中,可能导致永久性的耳蜗突触变性。本研究建立了噪声性耳蜗突触病模型,并设计了评价噪声性耳蜗突触病的电生理和组织学指标。将6只豚鼠置于突触病变噪声(4 kHz, 104 dB SPL,倍频带)下2小时。计算噪声存在下听觉脑干反应(ABR)波i和波iii潜伏期移位的振幅增长曲线。这些指标分别在噪声暴露前、暴露后1天(1DPE)、暴露后1周(1WPE)和暴露后1个月(1MPE)进行考虑。最后,对样本进行组织学分析。ABR波i幅值与dpe前后存在差异(p值≤0.05)。然而,在1WPE时,它在低强度下恢复,但在70 dB SPL及以上,差异甚至持续到1MPE。在隐蔽性ABR中,暴露前和暴露后3次评估中,iii波的潜伏期移位有差异(p值≤0.05)。电镜分析证实突触变性,突触带比正常大,内部空心,形状呈球形不规则,突触后密度异常增厚,失去了其平面取向。这些数据表明,低于这个水平的噪音会导致永久性听力丧失,会导致突触损伤。因此,噪音被认为比之前认为的更具破坏性。因此,设计突触病的临床评估工具,有利于噪声暴露史患者的综合听觉评估和听力保护规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sound and Vibration
Sound and Vibration 物理-工程:机械
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sound & Vibration is a journal intended for individuals with broad-based interests in noise and vibration, dynamic measurements, structural analysis, computer-aided engineering, machinery reliability, and dynamic testing. The journal strives to publish referred papers reflecting the interests of research and practical engineering on any aspects of sound and vibration. Of particular interest are papers that report analytical, numerical and experimental methods of more relevance to practical applications. Papers are sought that contribute to the following general topics: -broad-based interests in noise and vibration- dynamic measurements- structural analysis- computer-aided engineering- machinery reliability- dynamic testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信