M. Bunc, K. A. Juvan, J. Ambrožič, Š. Mušič, Bojan Kontestabile, A. Cerar, Irena Lopatič, N. Lakič, D. Zorman
{"title":"First transfemoral biologic aortic valve implantation in Slovenia","authors":"M. Bunc, K. A. Juvan, J. Ambrožič, Š. Mušič, Bojan Kontestabile, A. Cerar, Irena Lopatič, N. Lakič, D. Zorman","doi":"10.6016/342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calcified aortic stenosis is the most frequent\nvalvular heart disease in the Western world. It\nis a progressive, degenerative, atheroscleroticlike\nprocess that involves the aortic valve with\nincreasing prevalence as the population ages.\nSurgical aortic valve replacement is the treatment\nof choice for patients with severe, symptomatic\naortic stenosis, but it has limitations in\nold patients with high perioperative risk and in\npatients with comorbidities. A new method of\npercutanous aortic valve implantation has been\ndeveloped recently. It is indicated in symptomatic\npatients with high perioperative risk.\nCase report: A case of a 83-year-old female patient\nwith severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis\nand a high haemorrhagic risk due to vascular–\nectatic changes after surgery for gastric\ncarcinoid tumor is reported. She was refused for\nsurgical aortic valve replacement. Transfemoral\nimplantation of Edwards SAPIEN aortic valve\nwas indicated. On the day after implantation the patient stood up; she improved clinically as well\nas objectively.\nConclusions: Our case shows that there are additional\ntherapeutic options for high-risk patients\nwith severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral\naortic valve implantation is a procedure that\ndoes not require anaesthesia and thoracotomy. The implantation requires teamwork involving\ninterventional cardiologist, cardio-vascular\nsurgeon and anaesthesiologist. The real clinical\nvalue of the method is yet to be established as\na result of ongoing clinical trials and in cooperation\nbetween interventional cardiologists and\ncardiac surgeons.","PeriodicalId":49350,"journal":{"name":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"735-741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravniski Vestnik-Slovenian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6016/342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Calcified aortic stenosis is the most frequent
valvular heart disease in the Western world. It
is a progressive, degenerative, atheroscleroticlike
process that involves the aortic valve with
increasing prevalence as the population ages.
Surgical aortic valve replacement is the treatment
of choice for patients with severe, symptomatic
aortic stenosis, but it has limitations in
old patients with high perioperative risk and in
patients with comorbidities. A new method of
percutanous aortic valve implantation has been
developed recently. It is indicated in symptomatic
patients with high perioperative risk.
Case report: A case of a 83-year-old female patient
with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis
and a high haemorrhagic risk due to vascular–
ectatic changes after surgery for gastric
carcinoid tumor is reported. She was refused for
surgical aortic valve replacement. Transfemoral
implantation of Edwards SAPIEN aortic valve
was indicated. On the day after implantation the patient stood up; she improved clinically as well
as objectively.
Conclusions: Our case shows that there are additional
therapeutic options for high-risk patients
with severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral
aortic valve implantation is a procedure that
does not require anaesthesia and thoracotomy. The implantation requires teamwork involving
interventional cardiologist, cardio-vascular
surgeon and anaesthesiologist. The real clinical
value of the method is yet to be established as
a result of ongoing clinical trials and in cooperation
between interventional cardiologists and
cardiac surgeons.