Flipped vs. Traditional: An Analysis of Teaching Techniques in Finance and Psychology

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Andreychik, Valeria Martinez
{"title":"Flipped vs. Traditional: An Analysis of Teaching Techniques in Finance and Psychology","authors":"M. Andreychik, Valeria Martinez","doi":"10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently there has been a surge of interest in technology-aided teaching strategies such as the flipped classroom. Given the growing interest in these techniques it is important to critically evaluate their effectiveness. Although most existing research on the flipped classroom suggests an advantage of the flipped approach over a more traditional lecture approach, most of this research has been conducted in ways that preclude definitive conclusions about the relative effectiveness of the flipped approach. We present the results of a study that addressed many of these methodological limitations and compared the effectiveness of the flipped approach to a traditional lecture approach across two semesters in courses from two different disciplines, Finance and Psychology. We found mixed support for the effectiveness of the flipped vs. the traditional approach. In particular, in the Psychology courses the flipped approach resulted in superior performance on quizzes administered immediately after exposure to the material, but resulted in similar performance on exams administered some time after initial exposure. In contrast, in the Finance courses the flipped approach resulted in similar performance on immediately-administered quizzes, but superior performance on later-administered exams.","PeriodicalId":44633,"journal":{"name":"Teaching & Learning Inquiry-The ISSOTL Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching & Learning Inquiry-The ISSOTL Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Recently there has been a surge of interest in technology-aided teaching strategies such as the flipped classroom. Given the growing interest in these techniques it is important to critically evaluate their effectiveness. Although most existing research on the flipped classroom suggests an advantage of the flipped approach over a more traditional lecture approach, most of this research has been conducted in ways that preclude definitive conclusions about the relative effectiveness of the flipped approach. We present the results of a study that addressed many of these methodological limitations and compared the effectiveness of the flipped approach to a traditional lecture approach across two semesters in courses from two different disciplines, Finance and Psychology. We found mixed support for the effectiveness of the flipped vs. the traditional approach. In particular, in the Psychology courses the flipped approach resulted in superior performance on quizzes administered immediately after exposure to the material, but resulted in similar performance on exams administered some time after initial exposure. In contrast, in the Finance courses the flipped approach resulted in similar performance on immediately-administered quizzes, but superior performance on later-administered exams.
翻转与传统:金融与心理学教学技巧分析
最近,人们对技术辅助教学策略(如翻转课堂)的兴趣激增。鉴于对这些技术日益增长的兴趣,批判性地评估它们的有效性是很重要的。尽管大多数现有的关于翻转课堂的研究表明,翻转课堂比传统的课堂教学更有优势,但大多数研究都是以排除关于翻转课堂相对有效性的明确结论的方式进行的。我们提出了一项研究的结果,该研究解决了这些方法上的许多局限性,并在两个学期的两个不同学科(金融学和心理学)的课程中比较了翻转方法与传统讲座方法的有效性。我们发现,与传统方法相比,翻转方法的有效性得到了不同程度的支持。特别是,在心理学课程中,翻转方法在接触材料后立即进行的测验中表现优异,但在首次接触一段时间后进行的考试中表现相似。相比之下,在金融课程中,翻转方法在立即进行的测验中取得了类似的成绩,但在随后进行的考试中取得了更好的成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching & Learning Inquiry-The ISSOTL Journal
Teaching & Learning Inquiry-The ISSOTL Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信