The Reduction of Stranded Oil by In Situ Shoreline Treatment Options

Edward H Owens , Gary A Sergy , Chantal C Guénette , Roger C Prince , Kenneth Lee
{"title":"The Reduction of Stranded Oil by In Situ Shoreline Treatment Options","authors":"Edward H Owens ,&nbsp;Gary A Sergy ,&nbsp;Chantal C Guénette ,&nbsp;Roger C Prince ,&nbsp;Kenneth Lee","doi":"10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00041-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The Svalbard<span><span> Shoreline Field Trials quantified the effectiveness of sediment relocation, mixing, bioremediation, bioremediation combined with mixing, and </span>natural attenuation as options for the </span></span><em>in situ</em><span> treatment of oiled mixed-sediment (sand and pebble) shorelines. These treatments were applied to oiled plots located in the upper beach at three experimental sites, each with different sediment character and wave-energy exposure. Systematic monitoring was carried out over a 400-day period to quantify oil removal and to document changes in the physical character of the beach, oil penetration, oil loading, movements of oil to the subtidal environment, biodegradation, toxicity, and to validate oil-mineral aggregate formation.</span></p><p>The results of the monitoring confirmed that sediment relocation significantly accelerated the rate of oil removal and reduced oil persistence where oil was stranded on the beach face above the level of normal wave activity. Where the stranded oil was in the zone of wave action, sediment relocation accelerated the short-term (weeks) rate of oil loss from the intertidal sediments.</p><p>Oil removal rates on a beach treated by mechanical mixing or tilling were not significantly higher than those associated with natural recovery. However there is evidence that mixing/tilling may have enhanced microbial activity for a limited period by increasing the permeability of the sediment.</p><p>Changes in the chemical composition of the oil demonstrated that biodegradation was significant in this arctic environment and a bioremediation treatment protocol based on nutrient enrichment effectively doubled the rate of biodegradation. However, on an operational scale, the success of this treatment strategy was limited as physical processes were more important in causing oil loss from the beaches than biodegradation, even where this oil loss was stimulated by the bioremediation protocols.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101181,"journal":{"name":"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 257-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00041-0","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spill Science & Technology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353256103000410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

The Svalbard Shoreline Field Trials quantified the effectiveness of sediment relocation, mixing, bioremediation, bioremediation combined with mixing, and natural attenuation as options for the in situ treatment of oiled mixed-sediment (sand and pebble) shorelines. These treatments were applied to oiled plots located in the upper beach at three experimental sites, each with different sediment character and wave-energy exposure. Systematic monitoring was carried out over a 400-day period to quantify oil removal and to document changes in the physical character of the beach, oil penetration, oil loading, movements of oil to the subtidal environment, biodegradation, toxicity, and to validate oil-mineral aggregate formation.

The results of the monitoring confirmed that sediment relocation significantly accelerated the rate of oil removal and reduced oil persistence where oil was stranded on the beach face above the level of normal wave activity. Where the stranded oil was in the zone of wave action, sediment relocation accelerated the short-term (weeks) rate of oil loss from the intertidal sediments.

Oil removal rates on a beach treated by mechanical mixing or tilling were not significantly higher than those associated with natural recovery. However there is evidence that mixing/tilling may have enhanced microbial activity for a limited period by increasing the permeability of the sediment.

Changes in the chemical composition of the oil demonstrated that biodegradation was significant in this arctic environment and a bioremediation treatment protocol based on nutrient enrichment effectively doubled the rate of biodegradation. However, on an operational scale, the success of this treatment strategy was limited as physical processes were more important in causing oil loss from the beaches than biodegradation, even where this oil loss was stimulated by the bioremediation protocols.

就地岸线处理方案减少搁浅油
Svalbard海岸线现场试验量化了沉积物迁移、混合、生物修复、生物修复结合混合和自然衰减等方法的有效性,这些方法可作为受油混合沉积物(砂和卵石)海岸线的原位处理选择。这些处理方法应用于位于海滩上部的三个试验点的油污样地,每个试验点具有不同的沉积物特征和波能暴露。在400多天的时间里,进行了系统的监测,以量化除油量,记录海滩物理特性的变化、石油渗透、石油装载、石油向潮下环境的移动、生物降解、毒性,并验证石油-矿物聚集体的形成。监测结果证实,沉积物迁移显著加快了石油清除的速度,并减少了石油滞留在海滩表面高于正常波浪活动水平的地方的持久性。当搁浅油处于波浪作用带时,沉积物迁移加速了潮间带沉积物中石油的短期(周)损失速率。机械混合或耕作处理的海滩除油率并不显著高于自然恢复处理的海滩。然而,有证据表明,混合/耕作可能通过增加沉积物的渗透性而在有限的时期内增强微生物活动。石油化学成分的变化表明,在这种北极环境中,生物降解是显著的,基于营养富集的生物修复处理方案有效地使生物降解速度翻了一番。然而,在操作规模上,这种处理策略的成功是有限的,因为物理过程在造成海滩的石油损失方面比生物降解更重要,即使这种石油损失是由生物修复方案刺激的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信