Using stakeholder intervention refinement teams to develop approaches for real-time integration of patient-reported safety information during older adults’ hospital-to-home-health care transitions

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
A. Arbaje, Sylvan Greyson, Maningbè B. Keita Fakeye, D. Hohl, Kimberly Carl, Yea-Jen Hsu, Bruce Leff
{"title":"Using stakeholder intervention refinement teams to develop approaches for real-time integration of patient-reported safety information during older adults’ hospital-to-home-health care transitions","authors":"A. Arbaje, Sylvan Greyson, Maningbè B. Keita Fakeye, D. Hohl, Kimberly Carl, Yea-Jen Hsu, Bruce Leff","doi":"10.1177/25160435231199975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The hospital-to-home transition remains a high-risk care interval for older adults. Skilled home health (HH) agencies are uniquely positioned to address care-transitions-associated patient safety threats. We previously developed the Hospital-to-Home-Health Transition Quality (H3TQ) Index to identify safety issues after hospital discharge. Our objective is to evaluate a participatory ergonomics process engaging stakeholders to develop strategies to implement the H3TQ into HH agency workflow to improve transition-associated safety issues in real-time. Methods Stakeholders participated in three, two-hour Intervention Refinement Team (IRT) meetings with a focus on: (1) identifying facilitators and barriers to collect H3TQ data in real-time, (2) integration of H3TQ into workflows, and (3) sharing H3TQ safety threat information to improve care transition safety outcomes. We used the human factors engineering-informed Systems Ambiguity Framework to guide the structure of IRT meetings and qualitative data analysis to evaluate the IRT process itself. Results Stakeholders (N = 9) represented patients, family caregivers, and HH staff. Stakeholders identified three key strategies for H3TQ implementation: (1) mechanism and timing of H3TQ data collection using multiple platforms; (2) data sharing conditions for safety reporting across the health system; and (3) identification of targeted care transitions outcomes for improvement. Participants highly rated IRT meetings regarding meeting usefulness, comfort, and degree of input into the discussion. Conclusions The IRT participatory ergonomics process was successful. Stakeholders identified strategies to facilitate implementation of the H3TQ implementation to improve the hospital-to-HH. IRTs have potential application to other health system issues related to the care of people with complex needs.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"6 1","pages":"201 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231199975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background The hospital-to-home transition remains a high-risk care interval for older adults. Skilled home health (HH) agencies are uniquely positioned to address care-transitions-associated patient safety threats. We previously developed the Hospital-to-Home-Health Transition Quality (H3TQ) Index to identify safety issues after hospital discharge. Our objective is to evaluate a participatory ergonomics process engaging stakeholders to develop strategies to implement the H3TQ into HH agency workflow to improve transition-associated safety issues in real-time. Methods Stakeholders participated in three, two-hour Intervention Refinement Team (IRT) meetings with a focus on: (1) identifying facilitators and barriers to collect H3TQ data in real-time, (2) integration of H3TQ into workflows, and (3) sharing H3TQ safety threat information to improve care transition safety outcomes. We used the human factors engineering-informed Systems Ambiguity Framework to guide the structure of IRT meetings and qualitative data analysis to evaluate the IRT process itself. Results Stakeholders (N = 9) represented patients, family caregivers, and HH staff. Stakeholders identified three key strategies for H3TQ implementation: (1) mechanism and timing of H3TQ data collection using multiple platforms; (2) data sharing conditions for safety reporting across the health system; and (3) identification of targeted care transitions outcomes for improvement. Participants highly rated IRT meetings regarding meeting usefulness, comfort, and degree of input into the discussion. Conclusions The IRT participatory ergonomics process was successful. Stakeholders identified strategies to facilitate implementation of the H3TQ implementation to improve the hospital-to-HH. IRTs have potential application to other health system issues related to the care of people with complex needs.
利用利益相关者干预改进小组制定方法,在老年人从医院到家庭医疗保健过渡期间实时整合患者报告的安全信息
背景:从医院到家庭的转变仍然是老年人的高危护理间隔。 熟练的家庭 健康(HH)机构在解决与护理过渡相关的患者安全威胁方面具有独特的优势。我们之前开发了医院到家庭健康过渡质量(H3TQ)指数来识别出院后的安全问题。我们的目标是评估参与式人体工程学流程,让利益相关者参与制定战略,将H3TQ实施到HH机构工作流程中,以实时改善过渡相关的安全问题。方法利益相关者参加了三次,每次两小时的干预改进小组(IRT)会议,重点讨论:(1)确定实时收集H3TQ数据的促进因素和障碍;(2)将H3TQ整合到工作流程中;(3)共享H3TQ安全威胁信息,以改善护理过渡的安全结果。我们使用人因工程的系统模糊框架来指导IRT会议的结构,并使用定性数据分析来评估IRT过程本身。结果利益相关者(N = 9)代表患者、家庭照顾者和医护人员。利益相关者确定了实施H3TQ的三个关键策略:(1)利用多平台收集H3TQ数据的机制和时机;(2)整个卫生系统安全报告的数据共享条件;(3)确定有针对性的护理转变结果以改善。参与者高度评价IRT会议的有效性、舒适度和讨论的投入程度。结论IRT参与式人机工程学过程是成功的。利益攸关方确定了促进实施H3TQ的战略,以改善从医院到卫生保健。irt有可能应用于与照顾有复杂需求的人有关的其他卫生系统问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信