Contestation of Contemporary Islam: Conservative Islam versus Progressive Islam

Zuly Qodir, Bilveer Sight
{"title":"Contestation of Contemporary Islam: Conservative Islam versus Progressive Islam","authors":"Zuly Qodir, Bilveer Sight","doi":"10.14421/esensia.v23i2.4316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the articulation of Islamic thought in the 2014 and 2019 General Elections in Indonesia, both of which were marked by efforts by progressive and conservative Muslims to dominate public spaces. Contestation was evident in these political discourses, with progressive Muslims advocating for moderatism, political ethics, and tolerance in narratives of inclusivism, pluralism, and tolerance while conservative Muslims disseminating extremism, the formalization of sharia law, and intolerance in narratives of exclusivism and homogenization. The analysis questions the continuity-discontinuity, motives, and actors of both progressive and conservative Muslim movements and investigates the challenges for progressive Muslims in disseminating their narratives in Indonesia. The result argues that massive religious organizations in Indonesia articulate, internalize, and institutionalize progressive thought within their organizations and educational institutions. This article encourages progressive Muslims to reckon with and countermeasure conservativism among religious and political elites whose narratives exploit religious sentiments for practical purposes.","PeriodicalId":33284,"journal":{"name":"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v23i2.4316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article analyzes the articulation of Islamic thought in the 2014 and 2019 General Elections in Indonesia, both of which were marked by efforts by progressive and conservative Muslims to dominate public spaces. Contestation was evident in these political discourses, with progressive Muslims advocating for moderatism, political ethics, and tolerance in narratives of inclusivism, pluralism, and tolerance while conservative Muslims disseminating extremism, the formalization of sharia law, and intolerance in narratives of exclusivism and homogenization. The analysis questions the continuity-discontinuity, motives, and actors of both progressive and conservative Muslim movements and investigates the challenges for progressive Muslims in disseminating their narratives in Indonesia. The result argues that massive religious organizations in Indonesia articulate, internalize, and institutionalize progressive thought within their organizations and educational institutions. This article encourages progressive Muslims to reckon with and countermeasure conservativism among religious and political elites whose narratives exploit religious sentiments for practical purposes.
当代伊斯兰之争:保守伊斯兰与进步伊斯兰
本文分析了2014年和2019年印度尼西亚大选中伊斯兰思想的表达,这两次大选都以进步和保守的穆斯林努力主导公共空间为标志。在这些政治话语中,争论是显而易见的,进步的穆斯林在包容主义、多元主义和宽容的叙事中倡导现代主义、政治伦理和宽容,而保守的穆斯林在排外主义和同质化的叙事中传播极端主义、伊斯兰教法的正式化和不宽容。该分析质疑了进步和保守穆斯林运动的连续性-非连续性,动机和参与者,并调查了进步穆斯林在印度尼西亚传播其叙述时所面临的挑战。结果表明,印度尼西亚的大型宗教组织在其组织和教育机构中阐明,内化和制度化了进步思想。这篇文章鼓励进步的穆斯林去考虑和对抗宗教和政治精英中的保守主义,他们的叙事利用宗教情感来达到实际目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信