Evaluation of Blood and Biliary Drainage Cultures and Mortality after Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Procedure

Ayhan rk, A. Ayaz
{"title":"Evaluation of Blood and Biliary Drainage Cultures and Mortality after Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Procedure","authors":"Ayhan rk, A. Ayaz","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.02.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bacteremia and bile duct infection following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) are severe complications. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors of mortality and to evaluate the differences between blood and biliary drainage culture positive patients after PTBD. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 90 patients without any signs of infection prior to the PTBD procedures. Of these patients, we further divided them into three groups based on culture results: 1) first group was only bacteremic, 2) second group was only bile drainage culture-positive, and 3) third group was both bacteremic and bile drainage culture-positive. We compared clinical and laboratory parameters between these three groups and also evaluated the culture results in a high-resistance setting. Results:  There were 90 patients who developed bacteremia, bile duct infections or both. In the laboratory findings, bacteremic patients showed significantly higher serum level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p=0.001). Elevated neutrophil counts, lipase levels and carbapenem-resistant isolates were found to be the independent risk factors for 30-day mortality after PTBD. (p=0.01, p=0.01, and p=0.04, respectively). Gram-negative organisms were present in 71.2% of the cases; Escherichia coli was the most common species (28.1%) followed by Enterococcus faecium (18.1%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.9%). 51 (41.8%) of the cultured gram-negative bacteria were extended spectrum beta-lactamases positive and carbapenem resistance was found in 27 (15.8%) isolates. Conclusion: Elevated ALT level was only difference between three groups. Therefore, bacteremic and bile culture positive patients should be treated with the same care. Elevated neutrophil counts, lipase levels and carbapenem-resistant isolates were the independent risk factors for mortality. Finally, the choice of antibiotic prophylaxis should be reviewed according to the antimicrobial resistance profiles.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.02.054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bacteremia and bile duct infection following percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) are severe complications. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors of mortality and to evaluate the differences between blood and biliary drainage culture positive patients after PTBD. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study of 90 patients without any signs of infection prior to the PTBD procedures. Of these patients, we further divided them into three groups based on culture results: 1) first group was only bacteremic, 2) second group was only bile drainage culture-positive, and 3) third group was both bacteremic and bile drainage culture-positive. We compared clinical and laboratory parameters between these three groups and also evaluated the culture results in a high-resistance setting. Results:  There were 90 patients who developed bacteremia, bile duct infections or both. In the laboratory findings, bacteremic patients showed significantly higher serum level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (p=0.001). Elevated neutrophil counts, lipase levels and carbapenem-resistant isolates were found to be the independent risk factors for 30-day mortality after PTBD. (p=0.01, p=0.01, and p=0.04, respectively). Gram-negative organisms were present in 71.2% of the cases; Escherichia coli was the most common species (28.1%) followed by Enterococcus faecium (18.1%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (15.8%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.9%). 51 (41.8%) of the cultured gram-negative bacteria were extended spectrum beta-lactamases positive and carbapenem resistance was found in 27 (15.8%) isolates. Conclusion: Elevated ALT level was only difference between three groups. Therefore, bacteremic and bile culture positive patients should be treated with the same care. Elevated neutrophil counts, lipase levels and carbapenem-resistant isolates were the independent risk factors for mortality. Finally, the choice of antibiotic prophylaxis should be reviewed according to the antimicrobial resistance profiles.
经皮经肝胆道引流术后血液和胆道引流培养及死亡率的评估
导读:经皮肝胆道引流术(PTBD)后的细菌血症和胆管感染是严重的并发症。因此,本研究的目的是探讨死亡的危险因素,并评估血液和胆道引流培养阳性患者在PTBD后的差异。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,90例患者在PTBD手术前没有任何感染迹象。根据培养结果将患者进一步分为三组:1)第一组仅为菌血症,2)第二组仅为胆管引流培养阳性,3)第三组均为菌血症和胆管引流培养阳性。我们比较了这三组的临床和实验室参数,并评估了高耐药环境下的培养结果。结果:90例患者出现菌血症、胆管感染或两者兼有。实验室结果显示,菌血症患者血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)水平显著升高(p=0.001)。中性粒细胞计数、脂肪酶水平升高和碳青霉烯耐药分离株被发现是PTBD后30天死亡率的独立危险因素。(p=0.01, p=0.01, p=0.04)。71.2%的病例存在革兰氏阴性菌;最常见的菌种为大肠杆菌(28.1%)、屎肠球菌(18.1%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(15.8%)和铜绿假单胞菌(9.9%)。51株(41.8%)革兰氏阴性菌广谱β -内酰胺酶阳性,27株(15.8%)对碳青霉烯类耐药。结论:三组间仅存在ALT水平升高的差异。因此,菌血症和胆汁培养阳性患者应同样谨慎对待。嗜中性粒细胞计数、脂肪酶水平升高和碳青霉烯耐药分离株是死亡的独立危险因素。最后,应根据耐药情况审查抗生素预防的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信