Discrimination of three Angelica herbs using LC-QTOF/MS combined with multivariate analysis

Su-Jin Ahn, Hyung Joo Kim, Ayoung Lee, Seung-Sik Min, Eunmi Kim, Suncheun Kim
{"title":"Discrimination of three Angelica herbs using LC-QTOF/MS combined with multivariate analysis","authors":"Su-Jin Ahn, Hyung Joo Kim, Ayoung Lee, Seung-Sik Min, Eunmi Kim, Suncheun Kim","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2022.2069291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Angelica gigas, a popular medicinal herb in Korea, is locally called Danggui; this name is similarly used for Angelica acutiloba and Angelica sinensis, which are also sold in the retail market. These three herbs have differing therapeutic effects and should be used according to their prescribed purposes. In some retail markets, though, all three herbs are known by the same common name rather than a scientific name and can therefore be confused with each other. In particular, in the case of powdered products, intentional or unintentional wrong sales activity by the seller may occur. In this study, non-targeted analysis was performed using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to discriminate between the three Angelica herbs, and marker compounds were identified by principal component analysis. Principal component analysis was applied to the whole dataset with the variables being sample name, peak name (m/z with retention time), and ion intensity extracted in advance by peak finding, alignment, and filtering. All three herbs were visually and clearly differentiated in the score plot, and the marker compounds that contributed to their discrimination were found in the loading plot through principal component variable grouping (PCVG). Among the marker compounds, coumarins contributed to the classification of A. gigas, and phthalides contributed to the classification of A. sinensis. The three Angelica herbs were well discriminated from each other. Within the three Angelica species investigated, marker compounds can determine the species of even powdered or extracted samples that cannot be visually identified.","PeriodicalId":12121,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","volume":"45 1","pages":"1195 - 1205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2022.2069291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Angelica gigas, a popular medicinal herb in Korea, is locally called Danggui; this name is similarly used for Angelica acutiloba and Angelica sinensis, which are also sold in the retail market. These three herbs have differing therapeutic effects and should be used according to their prescribed purposes. In some retail markets, though, all three herbs are known by the same common name rather than a scientific name and can therefore be confused with each other. In particular, in the case of powdered products, intentional or unintentional wrong sales activity by the seller may occur. In this study, non-targeted analysis was performed using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry to discriminate between the three Angelica herbs, and marker compounds were identified by principal component analysis. Principal component analysis was applied to the whole dataset with the variables being sample name, peak name (m/z with retention time), and ion intensity extracted in advance by peak finding, alignment, and filtering. All three herbs were visually and clearly differentiated in the score plot, and the marker compounds that contributed to their discrimination were found in the loading plot through principal component variable grouping (PCVG). Among the marker compounds, coumarins contributed to the classification of A. gigas, and phthalides contributed to the classification of A. sinensis. The three Angelica herbs were well discriminated from each other. Within the three Angelica species investigated, marker compounds can determine the species of even powdered or extracted samples that cannot be visually identified.
LC-QTOF/MS结合多变量分析鉴别3种当归
当归(Angelica gigas)是韩国的一种流行草药,在当地被称为当归;这个名字与当归和当归相似,它们也在零售市场上出售。这三种草药有不同的治疗效果,应按其规定的用途使用。然而,在一些零售市场上,这三种草药都以相同的通用名称而不是学名而闻名,因此可能会相互混淆。特别是在粉状产品的情况下,可能会发生卖方有意或无意的错误销售活动。本研究采用液相色谱四极杆飞行时间质谱法对三种当归药材进行非靶向分析,并用主成分分析法对标记化合物进行鉴定。对整个数据集进行主成分分析,变量为样品名称、峰名(m/z随保留时间)和离子强度,通过找峰、对齐和过滤提前提取。3种药材在评分图上有明显的区分,并通过主成分变量分组(PCVG)在加载图上找到了导致其区分的标记化合物。在标记化合物中,香豆素类化合物对A. gigas的分类有贡献,邻苯酞类化合物对A. sinensis的分类有贡献。三种当归具有较好的鉴别性。在被调查的三个当归物种中,标记化合物可以确定甚至粉末状或提取的样品的物种,这些样品不能被视觉识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信