A Comparison of Single Bite and Double Bite Biopsy Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Scoping Review

M. Humayun, Umar Seemeen, A. Saqib, Mayberry John F
{"title":"A Comparison of Single Bite and Double Bite Biopsy Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Scoping Review","authors":"M. Humayun, Umar Seemeen, A. Saqib, Mayberry John F","doi":"10.36959/621/627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Endoscopic biopsies may be taken as single or double bite. In the former method intubation time may be proportionately prolonged depending upon the number of biopsies. In contrast to this, in the latter approach, although, a greater number of biopsies may be taken per unit time, equally, it may have effect on the quality of the biopsy specimen. This is because there is a perception that taking biopsies in such a manner may lead to crush artifacts and difficulty with orientation of the specimens. This, as a result, may pose diagnostic challenge to the histopathologist. A literature search was performed, and 11 studies, examining the histological quality of biopsies taken by these techniques, were identified. There were conflicting results. This is because there are considerable differences in the methodology, study power and interpretation of these studies. A holistic study is needed, which is clinically relevant, minimises selection bias and has sufficient power to clarify conflicting issues.","PeriodicalId":92206,"journal":{"name":"HSOA journal of gastroenterology & hepatology research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSOA journal of gastroenterology & hepatology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/621/627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Endoscopic biopsies may be taken as single or double bite. In the former method intubation time may be proportionately prolonged depending upon the number of biopsies. In contrast to this, in the latter approach, although, a greater number of biopsies may be taken per unit time, equally, it may have effect on the quality of the biopsy specimen. This is because there is a perception that taking biopsies in such a manner may lead to crush artifacts and difficulty with orientation of the specimens. This, as a result, may pose diagnostic challenge to the histopathologist. A literature search was performed, and 11 studies, examining the histological quality of biopsies taken by these techniques, were identified. There were conflicting results. This is because there are considerable differences in the methodology, study power and interpretation of these studies. A holistic study is needed, which is clinically relevant, minimises selection bias and has sufficient power to clarify conflicting issues.
胃肠道内窥镜单咬和双咬活检技术的比较:范围审查
内窥镜活检可单咬或双咬。在前一种方法中,插管时间可根据活检次数成比例地延长。与此相反,在后一种方法中,虽然单位时间内可以进行更多的活检,但同样可能对活检标本的质量产生影响。这是因为有一种看法认为,以这种方式进行活组织检查可能会导致工件挤压和标本定位困难。因此,这可能对组织病理学家提出诊断挑战。进行了文献检索,确定了11项研究,检查了这些技术所采取的活组织检查的组织学质量。结果相互矛盾。这是因为这些研究在方法论、研究能力和解释上存在相当大的差异。需要一项全面的研究,它与临床相关,最大限度地减少选择偏差,并有足够的力量澄清相互矛盾的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信