Educators’ Perspectives on Training Mechanisms That Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice Use for Autistic Students in General Education Settings: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Maria L. Hugh, M. Pullmann, Mahima Joshi, Daina M. Tagavi, Kaitlyn Ahlers, Alyssa M. Hernandez, Jill J. Locke
{"title":"Educators’ Perspectives on Training Mechanisms That Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice Use for Autistic Students in General Education Settings: A Mixed-Methods Analysis","authors":"Maria L. Hugh, M. Pullmann, Mahima Joshi, Daina M. Tagavi, Kaitlyn Ahlers, Alyssa M. Hernandez, Jill J. Locke","doi":"10.1177/08884064231178768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educators often feel ill-equipped to support autistic students in general education contexts, although research shows that inclusion in these settings can contribute to positive outcomes. Professional development (PD) in evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autistic students can address this need; however, it is essential to understand the mechanisms by which PD can improve educators’ EBP use. Through an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN→ QUAL), the authors gathered quantitative (Phase 1) and qualitative (Phase 2) data from 86 educators (special educators, general educators, and paraeducators) serving autistic students in general education elementary school classrooms. Using survey data on educators’ reported EBP training and use, the authors evaluated the effects of different training types (conference, in-service workshop, pre-service preparation, webinar, coaching/consultation) on educators’ use of EBPs for autistic students. The authors explored educators’ training experiences that facilitated their EBP use. The authors applied an established professional development framework to qualitative interview data to identify how key PD features (active learning, collective participation, content focus, cohesion, and sustained duration) have been accessed by educators and how they describe these as enabling their EBP use. Results demonstrate that pre-service training, in-service district or school-provided workshops, and coaching or consultation predicted EBP implementation. In addition, educators highlighted key PD features that facilitated EBP use, such as active learning. The authors discuss implications and guidance for incorporating these features within existing PD models to enhance EBP use for autistic students.","PeriodicalId":51596,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Education and Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Education and Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064231178768","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educators often feel ill-equipped to support autistic students in general education contexts, although research shows that inclusion in these settings can contribute to positive outcomes. Professional development (PD) in evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autistic students can address this need; however, it is essential to understand the mechanisms by which PD can improve educators’ EBP use. Through an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design (QUAN→ QUAL), the authors gathered quantitative (Phase 1) and qualitative (Phase 2) data from 86 educators (special educators, general educators, and paraeducators) serving autistic students in general education elementary school classrooms. Using survey data on educators’ reported EBP training and use, the authors evaluated the effects of different training types (conference, in-service workshop, pre-service preparation, webinar, coaching/consultation) on educators’ use of EBPs for autistic students. The authors explored educators’ training experiences that facilitated their EBP use. The authors applied an established professional development framework to qualitative interview data to identify how key PD features (active learning, collective participation, content focus, cohesion, and sustained duration) have been accessed by educators and how they describe these as enabling their EBP use. Results demonstrate that pre-service training, in-service district or school-provided workshops, and coaching or consultation predicted EBP implementation. In addition, educators highlighted key PD features that facilitated EBP use, such as active learning. The authors discuss implications and guidance for incorporating these features within existing PD models to enhance EBP use for autistic students.
教育工作者对促进自闭症学生在普通教育环境中循证实践使用的培训机制的看法:一项混合方法分析
教育工作者常常觉得自己没有能力在普通教育环境中支持自闭症学生,尽管研究表明,在这些环境中融入自闭症学生可以产生积极的结果。针对自闭症学生的循证实践(ebp)专业发展(PD)可以解决这一需求;然而,了解PD可以提高教育者EBP使用的机制是至关重要的。通过解释顺序混合方法设计(QUAN→QUAL),作者收集了在普通教育小学课堂上为自闭症学生服务的86名教育工作者(特殊教育工作者、普通教育工作者和辅助教育工作者)的定量(第一阶段)和定性(第二阶段)数据。通过对教育工作者的EBP培训和使用的调查数据,作者评估了不同类型的培训(会议、在职研讨会、职前准备、网络研讨会、辅导/咨询)对教育工作者对自闭症学生使用EBP的影响。作者探讨了促进教育者使用EBP的培训经验。作者将一个已建立的专业发展框架应用于定性访谈数据,以确定教育工作者如何获得PD的关键特征(主动学习、集体参与、内容关注、凝聚力和持续时间),以及他们如何描述这些特征使他们能够使用EBP。结果表明,职前培训、在职区或学校提供的研讨会、辅导或咨询对EBP的实施具有预测作用。此外,教育工作者强调了PD促进EBP使用的关键特征,如主动学习。作者讨论了将这些特征纳入现有PD模型以增强自闭症学生EBP使用的含义和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teacher Education and Special Education
Teacher Education and Special Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信