Liquid-Based Cytology Compared to Conventional Cytology for Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Experience

L. Flores-Hernández, Ramírez-Uribe Rd, Villegas-González Lf, Serrano-Arévalo Ml, Cordoba-Gonzalez, Barquet-Muñoz Sa
{"title":"Liquid-Based Cytology Compared to Conventional Cytology for Diagnosis of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Single-Center Experience","authors":"L. Flores-Hernández, Ramírez-Uribe Rd, Villegas-González Lf, Serrano-Arévalo Ml, Cordoba-Gonzalez, Barquet-Muñoz Sa","doi":"10.15744/2454-3284.4.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conclusion: Considering no statistically differences in the results and the outlay of LBC, implementation of LBC should be used for molecular-based detection and genotyping when human papillomavirus may offer additional benefits when screening for cervical carcinoma. Introduction: Cervical carcinoma is the fourth most common gynecologic cancer. Screening assays that include the conventional cytology (CC) have a sensitivity and specificity far from optimal; however, liquid-based cytology (LBC) may overcome some limitations. The objective is to compare the screening accuracy of LBC and CC in individuals suspected of having precancerous lesions.","PeriodicalId":91315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology research","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15744/2454-3284.4.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conclusion: Considering no statistically differences in the results and the outlay of LBC, implementation of LBC should be used for molecular-based detection and genotyping when human papillomavirus may offer additional benefits when screening for cervical carcinoma. Introduction: Cervical carcinoma is the fourth most common gynecologic cancer. Screening assays that include the conventional cytology (CC) have a sensitivity and specificity far from optimal; however, liquid-based cytology (LBC) may overcome some limitations. The objective is to compare the screening accuracy of LBC and CC in individuals suspected of having precancerous lesions.
液基细胞学与常规细胞学诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变的比较:单中心经验
结论:考虑到LBC的结果和费用没有统计学差异,当人乳头瘤病毒可能为宫颈癌筛查提供额外的好处时,LBC的实施应用于基于分子的检测和基因分型。简介:宫颈癌是第四大常见妇科癌症。包括常规细胞学(CC)在内的筛选试验灵敏度和特异性远未达到最佳水平;然而,液体细胞学(LBC)可以克服一些局限性。目的是比较在怀疑有癌前病变的个体中LBC和CC的筛查准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信