Pharmacy in Latvia during the first Soviet occupation (1940-1941).

S. Lauze, B. Mauriņa, V. Šidlovska
{"title":"Pharmacy in Latvia during the first Soviet occupation (1940-1941).","authors":"S. Lauze, B. Mauriņa, V. Šidlovska","doi":"10.1691/ph.2019.8232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first period of the independent state of Latvia lasted from 1918 to 1940. During this period, pharmacy in Latvia had reached a high level of development. The study covers the period after the loss of independence, when the beginning of World War II marked a major crisis in the development of pharmacy in Latvia. The aim of the study was to compile and systematize information available in published and unpublished sources on the impact of the Soviet occupation (1940-1941) on pharmacy in Latvia, which has not been studied before. The main idea of the study was to find evidence that the Soviet occupation decreased the development capacity of Latvian pharmaceutical industry and narrowed its development opportunities. At the same time, the study reflects part of the general political, ideological and economic environment in Latvia over that period. The study is retrospective and descriptive. Materials from Latvian State Historical Archives and the National Archives of Latvia, and publications from the 20th century press of Latvia were used in the study. In one year, the Soviet system attempted to aggressively transform Latvian pharmaceutical industry to match the USSR standards. This meant the destruction of the capitalist system and the free market, as well as the introduction of centralised management. The radical changes were poorly organised and unsuitable candidates were appointed to positions of responsibility. There is evidence that pharmacy in Latvia experienced complete chaos during that period: private enterprises were nationalised, the number of pharmacy professionals decreased, and medical products from abroad were not supplied to the Latvian market. The Latvian population was rescued from total lack of medications by the last major medication purchase from Germany and the Netherlands shortly before the occupation. All the USSR actions in the pharmaceutical industry were coercive. With the occupation of Nazi Germany in the summer of 1941, the Soviet functionaries left the industry. However, in 1945, during the second occupation, the previous procedures were renewed and their results strengthened. It leads to the conclusion that the Soviet political system had an adverse effect on the development of pharmacy in Latvia.","PeriodicalId":86039,"journal":{"name":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","volume":"2 1","pages":"505-510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Pharmazie. Beihefte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2019.8232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The first period of the independent state of Latvia lasted from 1918 to 1940. During this period, pharmacy in Latvia had reached a high level of development. The study covers the period after the loss of independence, when the beginning of World War II marked a major crisis in the development of pharmacy in Latvia. The aim of the study was to compile and systematize information available in published and unpublished sources on the impact of the Soviet occupation (1940-1941) on pharmacy in Latvia, which has not been studied before. The main idea of the study was to find evidence that the Soviet occupation decreased the development capacity of Latvian pharmaceutical industry and narrowed its development opportunities. At the same time, the study reflects part of the general political, ideological and economic environment in Latvia over that period. The study is retrospective and descriptive. Materials from Latvian State Historical Archives and the National Archives of Latvia, and publications from the 20th century press of Latvia were used in the study. In one year, the Soviet system attempted to aggressively transform Latvian pharmaceutical industry to match the USSR standards. This meant the destruction of the capitalist system and the free market, as well as the introduction of centralised management. The radical changes were poorly organised and unsuitable candidates were appointed to positions of responsibility. There is evidence that pharmacy in Latvia experienced complete chaos during that period: private enterprises were nationalised, the number of pharmacy professionals decreased, and medical products from abroad were not supplied to the Latvian market. The Latvian population was rescued from total lack of medications by the last major medication purchase from Germany and the Netherlands shortly before the occupation. All the USSR actions in the pharmaceutical industry were coercive. With the occupation of Nazi Germany in the summer of 1941, the Soviet functionaries left the industry. However, in 1945, during the second occupation, the previous procedures were renewed and their results strengthened. It leads to the conclusion that the Soviet political system had an adverse effect on the development of pharmacy in Latvia.
第一次苏联占领期间拉脱维亚的药房(1940-1941)。
拉脱维亚独立的第一个时期从1918年持续到1940年。在此期间,拉脱维亚的药学达到了很高的发展水平。这项研究涵盖了失去独立后的时期,当时第二次世界大战的开始标志着拉脱维亚药房发展的重大危机。这项研究的目的是汇编和系统化已发表和未发表的关于苏联占领(1940-1941)对拉脱维亚药房影响的资料,这是以前没有研究过的。研究的主要思想是寻找证据,证明苏联的占领降低了拉脱维亚制药工业的发展能力,缩小了其发展机会。同时,该研究报告反映了拉脱维亚在这一时期的一般政治、意识形态和经济环境的一部分。本研究是回顾性和描述性的。研究中使用了拉脱维亚国家历史档案馆和拉脱维亚国家档案馆的资料,以及拉脱维亚20世纪出版社的出版物。在一年的时间里,苏联体制试图积极改造拉脱维亚的制药工业,使其达到苏联的标准。这意味着资本主义制度和自由市场的毁灭,以及中央集权管理的引入。激进的变革组织得很差,不合适的候选人被任命为负责任的职位。有证据表明,拉脱维亚的药房在此期间经历了彻底的混乱:私营企业被国有化,药房专业人员的数量减少,国外的医疗产品不供应给拉脱维亚市场。在占领之前不久,从德国和荷兰购买的最后一批主要药品使拉脱维亚人摆脱了药品完全缺乏的困境。苏联在制药业的所有行动都是强制性的。随着1941年夏天纳粹德国的占领,苏联官员离开了这个行业。然而,在1945年第二次占领期间,恢复了以前的程序,其结果得到加强。由此得出结论,苏联的政治制度对拉脱维亚的药学发展产生了不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信