A RANDOMISED OPEN LABELLED COMPARATIVE PARALLEL GROUP CLINICAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF INTERFERENTIAL THERAPY & KATI BASTI IN GRIDHRASI WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SCIATICA

Biraj Jung Khadka, Ganesh Puttur
{"title":"A RANDOMISED OPEN LABELLED COMPARATIVE PARALLEL GROUP CLINICAL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF INTERFERENTIAL THERAPY & KATI BASTI IN GRIDHRASI WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SCIATICA","authors":"Biraj Jung Khadka, Ganesh Puttur","doi":"10.7897/2230-8407.1212176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Snigdha Swedana plays an important role in the management of Vata Vyadhi among which Katibasti is one which is indicated in Vata related pathogenesis in Kati Pradesha. Gridhrasi is a Vataja Nanatmaja Vyadhi. Katibasti is an effective treatment in Gridhrasi as it acts as both Snehana and Swedana. Interferential therapy is a form of electrical current that is primarily used for relief from pain. It is said to be effective in case of low back pain. Both Katibasti and Interferential therapy are commonly used treatment modalities in sciatica, hence the present study is intended to compare the efficacy of Katibasti and Interferential therapy in the treatment of Gridhrasi. Thirty-four subjects of Gridhrasi were randomly distributed in 2 groups (A and B) of 15 subjects each. Group A subjects were treated with Katibasti using Maha Vishagarbha Taila for 7 days. Group B subjects were treated with Interferential Therapy for 7 days. Follow up was done on the 14th day. The statistical analysis within the group showed significant improvement in all the parameters in Katibasti group as well as IFT group. Comparative analysis between the groups showed no significant difference between the groups in all the parameters. Clinically, there was a slight difference between two groups. During follow up it was noticed that symptomatic relief was more in Katibasti than Interferential Therapy.","PeriodicalId":14413,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal Of Pharmacy","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal Of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7897/2230-8407.1212176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Snigdha Swedana plays an important role in the management of Vata Vyadhi among which Katibasti is one which is indicated in Vata related pathogenesis in Kati Pradesha. Gridhrasi is a Vataja Nanatmaja Vyadhi. Katibasti is an effective treatment in Gridhrasi as it acts as both Snehana and Swedana. Interferential therapy is a form of electrical current that is primarily used for relief from pain. It is said to be effective in case of low back pain. Both Katibasti and Interferential therapy are commonly used treatment modalities in sciatica, hence the present study is intended to compare the efficacy of Katibasti and Interferential therapy in the treatment of Gridhrasi. Thirty-four subjects of Gridhrasi were randomly distributed in 2 groups (A and B) of 15 subjects each. Group A subjects were treated with Katibasti using Maha Vishagarbha Taila for 7 days. Group B subjects were treated with Interferential Therapy for 7 days. Follow up was done on the 14th day. The statistical analysis within the group showed significant improvement in all the parameters in Katibasti group as well as IFT group. Comparative analysis between the groups showed no significant difference between the groups in all the parameters. Clinically, there was a slight difference between two groups. During follow up it was noticed that symptomatic relief was more in Katibasti than Interferential Therapy.
一项随机、开放标记、比较平行组临床研究,评价干预治疗坐骨神经痛的疗效
Snigdha Swedana在Vata Vyadhi的治疗中起着重要作用,其中Katibasti是在katipradesha的Vata相关发病机制中指出的一种。Gridhrasi是Vataja Nanatmaja Vyadhi。Katibasti对Gridhrasi是一种有效的治疗方法,因为它对Snehana和Swedana都有作用。干扰疗法是一种主要用于缓解疼痛的电流疗法。据说对腰痛有效。katibasi和干扰疗法都是坐骨神经痛常用的治疗方式,因此本研究旨在比较katibasi和干扰疗法治疗Gridhrasi的疗效。将34只格拉西鼠随机分为A、B两组,每组15只。A组患者使用Maha Vishagarbha Taila治疗Katibasti 7 d。B组患者给予干扰治疗7 d。第14天随访。组内统计分析显示,Katibasti组及IFT组各项指标均有显著改善。组间比较分析显示,各组间各项指标均无显著差异。临床上,两组间有轻微差异。在随访中,我们注意到卡提巴斯提治疗比干预治疗更能缓解症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信