Does dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor increase the risk of heart failure? A cardiologist's paradox

R. Kanakia, S. Martinho, T. Patel, F. A. Arain, Manoj Panday, C. J. Saux, S. Pham, S. Bailey, R. Chilton
{"title":"Does dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor increase the risk of heart failure? A cardiologist's paradox","authors":"R. Kanakia, S. Martinho, T. Patel, F. A. Arain, Manoj Panday, C. J. Saux, S. Pham, S. Bailey, R. Chilton","doi":"10.1097/XCE.0000000000000036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes patients have a higher burden of cardiovascular disease compared with the general population. In addition, type 2 diabetes portends a very high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. The SAVOR trial showed that patients with documented type 2 diabetes and a previous history of, or risk factors for, cardiovascular disease had a 1-year cardiovascular event rate of 2 – 3%. Whereas in the EXAMINE trial, type 2 diabetes patients with acute coronary syndrome had a 1-year event rate between 6 and 7% after revascularization. Both of these prospective trials used new dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors as the treatment modality. Clinically, this class of compounds is extremely well tolerated by patients. The new DPP-4 inhibitors were promising from previous meta-analyses at reducing cardiovascular outcomes. In this article, we review literature on the cardiovascular outcomes with oral hypoglycemic agents, focusing on the two recent, large prospective trials on DDP-4 inhibitors. It is important to recognize that these trials enrolled different patients. The SAVOR trial had type 2 diabetes patients ( > 40 years old) with established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors, whereas EXAMINE trial had type 2 diabetes patients ( > 18 years old) 15 – 90 days postrevascularization for acute coronary syndrome. The primary cardiovascular endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Neither trial showed a significant cardiovascular benefit. However, neither trial showed increased cardiovascular mortality. Cardiovasc Endocrinol 3:111 – 116 © 2014 Wolters Wilkins. Cardiovascular Endocrinology 2014, 3: 111 – 116","PeriodicalId":72529,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular endocrinology","volume":"17 1","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCE.0000000000000036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Diabetes patients have a higher burden of cardiovascular disease compared with the general population. In addition, type 2 diabetes portends a very high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. The SAVOR trial showed that patients with documented type 2 diabetes and a previous history of, or risk factors for, cardiovascular disease had a 1-year cardiovascular event rate of 2 – 3%. Whereas in the EXAMINE trial, type 2 diabetes patients with acute coronary syndrome had a 1-year event rate between 6 and 7% after revascularization. Both of these prospective trials used new dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitors as the treatment modality. Clinically, this class of compounds is extremely well tolerated by patients. The new DPP-4 inhibitors were promising from previous meta-analyses at reducing cardiovascular outcomes. In this article, we review literature on the cardiovascular outcomes with oral hypoglycemic agents, focusing on the two recent, large prospective trials on DDP-4 inhibitors. It is important to recognize that these trials enrolled different patients. The SAVOR trial had type 2 diabetes patients ( > 40 years old) with established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors, whereas EXAMINE trial had type 2 diabetes patients ( > 18 years old) 15 – 90 days postrevascularization for acute coronary syndrome. The primary cardiovascular endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Neither trial showed a significant cardiovascular benefit. However, neither trial showed increased cardiovascular mortality. Cardiovasc Endocrinol 3:111 – 116 © 2014 Wolters Wilkins. Cardiovascular Endocrinology 2014, 3: 111 – 116
二肽基肽酶IV抑制剂会增加心力衰竭的风险吗?心脏病专家的悖论
与普通人群相比,糖尿病患者的心血管疾病负担更高。此外,2型糖尿病预示着发生主要不良心血管事件的风险非常高。SAVOR试验显示,有2型糖尿病病史和既往心血管疾病病史或危险因素的患者1年心血管事件发生率为2 - 3%。而在EXAMINE试验中,2型糖尿病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者在血运重建术后的1年事件发生率在6 - 7%之间。这两项前瞻性试验都使用新的二肽基肽酶IV (DPP-4)抑制剂作为治疗方式。在临床上,这类化合物对患者的耐受性非常好。从之前的荟萃分析来看,新的DPP-4抑制剂在降低心血管预后方面很有希望。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了关于口服降糖药的心血管结局的文献,重点是最近两项关于DDP-4抑制剂的大型前瞻性试验。重要的是要认识到这些试验纳入了不同的患者。在SAVOR试验中,2型糖尿病患者(> 40岁)有明确的心血管疾病或多种心血管危险因素,而在EXAMINE试验中,2型糖尿病患者(> 18岁)在急性冠状动脉综合征血管化术后15 - 90天。主要心血管终点为心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或非致死性卒中的复合终点。两项试验均未显示出显著的心血管益处。然而,两项试验均未显示心血管疾病死亡率增加。心血管内分泌3:111 - 116©2014沃尔特斯威尔金斯。中华心血管病杂志,2014,(3):111 - 116
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信