Group Work Practice Articles: Recommendations for Manuscript Development

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jane E. Atieno Okech, J. Ohrt, S. Steen, Kristopher M. Goodrich
{"title":"Group Work Practice Articles: Recommendations for Manuscript Development","authors":"Jane E. Atieno Okech, J. Ohrt, S. Steen, Kristopher M. Goodrich","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2014744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The editorial board for The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW) always appreciates the promise and opportunities provided by each new manuscript submitted to the journal for review. As the official publication of the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW), we are deeply committed to publishing strong group work articles that can inform the practice of group work. This comes from our deep roots within the broader profession of counselor education and is informed by the scientist-practitioner model (Jones & Mehr, 2007) that serves as a foundation for our field. The scientist-practitioner model is a training (and we would suggest practice) model that integrates science with practice, whereas “each must continually inform the other” (Belar & Perry, 1992, pp. 72). What this means for our clinical-rooted profession is that research coming out of the field should be reflective of the practice taking place within that field, and practice that is occurring should be researched. As a specialty journal focused on group work, we are invested in securing rigorous articles that can inform the science and practice of group work. Although each of our submission categories reflect the scientist-practitioner model in some way, the category that most directly reflects this mission is the “Practice” category. The description of practice manuscripts can be found in the “Aims and Scope” page of our journal’s website and notes,","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":"22 1","pages":"1 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2014744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The editorial board for The Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW) always appreciates the promise and opportunities provided by each new manuscript submitted to the journal for review. As the official publication of the Association for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW), we are deeply committed to publishing strong group work articles that can inform the practice of group work. This comes from our deep roots within the broader profession of counselor education and is informed by the scientist-practitioner model (Jones & Mehr, 2007) that serves as a foundation for our field. The scientist-practitioner model is a training (and we would suggest practice) model that integrates science with practice, whereas “each must continually inform the other” (Belar & Perry, 1992, pp. 72). What this means for our clinical-rooted profession is that research coming out of the field should be reflective of the practice taking place within that field, and practice that is occurring should be researched. As a specialty journal focused on group work, we are invested in securing rigorous articles that can inform the science and practice of group work. Although each of our submission categories reflect the scientist-practitioner model in some way, the category that most directly reflects this mission is the “Practice” category. The description of practice manuscripts can be found in the “Aims and Scope” page of our journal’s website and notes,
小组工作实践文章:手稿发展建议
《小组工作专家杂志》(JSGW)的编辑委员会一直很感激每一篇提交给该杂志进行评审的新稿件所带来的希望和机会。作为小组工作专家协会(ASGW)的官方出版物,我们坚定地致力于发表强有力的小组工作文章,这些文章可以为小组工作的实践提供信息。这源于我们在更广泛的咨询教育职业中的深厚根基,并由科学家-从业者模型(Jones & Mehr, 2007)提供信息,该模型是我们领域的基础。科学家-实践者模式是一种训练(我们建议实践)模式,它将科学与实践相结合,而“每个人都必须不断地告知对方”(Belar & Perry, 1992,第72页)。这对我们这个以临床为基础的职业来说意味着,该领域的研究应该反映出该领域内发生的实践,并且应该对正在发生的实践进行研究。作为一个专注于小组工作的专业期刊,我们致力于确保严谨的文章,这些文章可以为小组工作的科学和实践提供信息。虽然我们提交的每个类别都以某种方式反映了科学家-实践者模式,但最直接反映这一使命的类别是“实践”类别。实践稿件的描述可以在本刊网站的“目标和范围”页面和笔记中找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信