Onyenachiya: A New Perspective on Religion in African Philosophy of Religion

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Christiana Idika, M. Enyimba
{"title":"Onyenachiya: A New Perspective on Religion in African Philosophy of Religion","authors":"Christiana Idika, M. Enyimba","doi":"10.4314/ft.v11i4.12s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How does one understand the relationship between a person and their objects of belief in the philosophy of Religion? How does the object of belief  impact individuals’ lives, choices, decisions, and what they become in the future? The character of religion is binding, and the object of belief in a being –  transcendent or immanent as the sole determinant of the fate and destiny of individuals leaves room for many questions that border on freedom and  responsibility. By introducing Onyenachiya to the discussion of the phenomenon of religion from an African philosophical approach to religion, the  authors argue that there is a certain threshold of self-evaluation and relationship between a person and their object of belief which is significantly  cooperative and collaborative. Although onyenachiya, a concept that stems from an African epistemic context (Igbo), has no corresponding English  translation, it is a contraction of two independent words, onye (person, giver, who) and chi (personal god, doppelgänger). The two are joined together by  conjunction, ‘na’ with the suffix ‘ya’ at the end, emphasizing the chi’s personal and unique nature. The authors argue that if chi is connected to a person's  destiny, onyenachiya demonstrates an agent-centered destiny, which gives room for agency, accountability, and responsibility and gives a new account of  religious tolerance. ","PeriodicalId":37706,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Theoretica","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Theoretica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ft.v11i4.12s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does one understand the relationship between a person and their objects of belief in the philosophy of Religion? How does the object of belief  impact individuals’ lives, choices, decisions, and what they become in the future? The character of religion is binding, and the object of belief in a being –  transcendent or immanent as the sole determinant of the fate and destiny of individuals leaves room for many questions that border on freedom and  responsibility. By introducing Onyenachiya to the discussion of the phenomenon of religion from an African philosophical approach to religion, the  authors argue that there is a certain threshold of self-evaluation and relationship between a person and their object of belief which is significantly  cooperative and collaborative. Although onyenachiya, a concept that stems from an African epistemic context (Igbo), has no corresponding English  translation, it is a contraction of two independent words, onye (person, giver, who) and chi (personal god, doppelgänger). The two are joined together by  conjunction, ‘na’ with the suffix ‘ya’ at the end, emphasizing the chi’s personal and unique nature. The authors argue that if chi is connected to a person's  destiny, onyenachiya demonstrates an agent-centered destiny, which gives room for agency, accountability, and responsibility and gives a new account of  religious tolerance. 
奥尼纳奇亚:非洲宗教哲学中的宗教新视角
在宗教哲学中,人们如何理解人与信仰对象之间的关系?信仰的对象如何影响个人的生活、选择、决定,以及他们未来的样子?宗教的性质是具有约束力的,而信仰的对象是一种存在——超越的或内在的存在,作为个人命运和命运的唯一决定因素,这就为许多与自由和责任有关的问题留下了空间。通过将奥尼纳奇亚引入非洲哲学对宗教现象的讨论,作者认为,一个人与他的信仰对象之间的自我评价和关系存在一定的阈值,这种阈值具有显著的合作性和合作性。虽然onyenachiya这个概念源于非洲的认知语境(伊博语),没有相应的英语翻译,但它是两个独立单词的缩写,onye(人,给予者,谁)和chi(个人神,doppelgänger)。这两个词通过连词连接在一起,“那”和后缀“雅”在最后,强调气的个人和独特的性质。作者认为,如果气与一个人的命运有关,那么onyenachiya展示了一种以主体为中心的命运,它为代理、责任和责任提供了空间,并对宗教宽容做出了新的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofia Theoretica
Filosofia Theoretica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Filosofia Theoretica is a publication of Calabar School of Philosophy (CSP), University of Calabar. From 2018, the journal will begin to publish a third issue which will be a bi-lingual edition in both French and English languages. Filosofia Theoretica provides outlet for well researched and original papers in the following areas of African studies: philosophy, culture, religions, history and arts. It also publishes book reviews. Its publication cycle is January-June and July-December issues. The journal is abstracted/indexed on SCOPUS, EBSCO Humanities Source, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Ajol, EBSCO Database, Philosopher''s index, etc. Filosofia Theoretica is also accredited by the Department of Higher Education and Training (DoHET), South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信