Die musikalische Ambivalenz in Kleists Die heilige Cäcilie oder die Gewalt der Musik: Urteil über den Katholizismus oder Hilfsmittel zur Glaubensfindung?

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
ARCADIA Pub Date : 2020-06-05 DOI:10.1515/arcadia-2020-0005
Raphaela Tkotzyk
{"title":"Die musikalische Ambivalenz in Kleists Die heilige Cäcilie oder die Gewalt der Musik: Urteil über den Katholizismus oder Hilfsmittel zur Glaubensfindung?","authors":"Raphaela Tkotzyk","doi":"10.1515/arcadia-2020-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Heinrich von Kleist’s attitude toward the Catholic Church has produced two major positions in modern German literature. On one hand, there are those who understand Kleist simply as a church critic; on the other hand, there are those who consider Kleist’s attitude – and his alleged Kantian crisis and departure from all scholars – as supportive towards the Church. Die heilige Cäcilie precisely exemplifies this debate, because, depending on the way one reads the narrative, the text can be interpreted as an endorsement or as a criticism of the Church. However, the text can be read quite differently for yet, a third, alternative understanding: the element of music involved in Die heilige Cäcilie undermines a concrete definition of its position as well as a concrete statement regarding Kleist’s religious creed. Thereby, it serves as a tool to help the reader to make decisions in terms of religious beliefs and doctrines.","PeriodicalId":43010,"journal":{"name":"ARCADIA","volume":"15 1","pages":"25 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCADIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2020-0005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Heinrich von Kleist’s attitude toward the Catholic Church has produced two major positions in modern German literature. On one hand, there are those who understand Kleist simply as a church critic; on the other hand, there are those who consider Kleist’s attitude – and his alleged Kantian crisis and departure from all scholars – as supportive towards the Church. Die heilige Cäcilie precisely exemplifies this debate, because, depending on the way one reads the narrative, the text can be interpreted as an endorsement or as a criticism of the Church. However, the text can be read quite differently for yet, a third, alternative understanding: the element of music involved in Die heilige Cäcilie undermines a concrete definition of its position as well as a concrete statement regarding Kleist’s religious creed. Thereby, it serves as a tool to help the reader to make decisions in terms of religious beliefs and doctrines.
隐藏在科斯莫斯中的音乐模棱两可,或者是音乐的暴力:评价天主教,还是发现信仰的工具?
海因里希·冯·克莱斯特对天主教会的态度在德国现代文学中形成了两大立场。一方面,有些人把克莱斯特简单地理解为教会批评家;另一方面,有些人认为克莱斯特的态度——以及他所谓的康德危机和对所有学者的背离——是对教会的支持。Die heilige Cäcilie正是这场辩论的例证,因为,根据人们阅读叙事的方式,文本可以被解释为对教会的认可或批评。然而,文本可以被完全不同地解读,第三,另一种理解:《Die heilige Cäcilie》中涉及的音乐元素破坏了对其立场的具体定义,以及对克莱斯特宗教信仰的具体陈述。因此,它作为一种工具,帮助读者在宗教信仰和教义方面做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARCADIA
ARCADIA LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: arcadia provides a forum for internationally comparative studies that deal with literatures and liberal arts from all parts of the world. Current theories associated with these literatures and liberal arts are discussed. arcadia includes the columns: essays, miscellanea, reviews, submitted works and news.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信