Survivorship analysis of CAD-CAM total shoulder replacement.

IF 5.9 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
American Political Science Review Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1177/17585732231193285
Sandeep Krishan Nayar, David Butt, Aditya Prinja, Will Rudge, Addie Majed, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth
{"title":"Survivorship analysis of CAD-CAM total shoulder replacement.","authors":"Sandeep Krishan Nayar, David Butt, Aditya Prinja, Will Rudge, Addie Majed, Deborah Higgs, Mark Falworth","doi":"10.1177/17585732231193285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glenoid bone loss represents a challenge in shoulder arthroplasty and often precludes standard implants. The CAD-CAM total shoulder replacement (TSR) is an option in these cases. This study aimed to assess survivorship and long-term patient outcomes of the CAD-CAM TSR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-eight patients that underwent a CAD-CAM TSR by three surgeons at a single tertiary referral centre between 2009 and 2017 were reviewed. The mean follow-up was 70 months (28-130). Data was collected on survivorship, range of movement, Oxford shoulder score (OSS, 0-48), subjective shoulder value (SSV, 0-100%), pain score (0-10), and overall patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CAD-CAM TSR was undertaken as a primary procedure in 28% (<i>n</i> = 16) for end-stage arthritis with severe glenoid bone loss, and as a revision procedure in 72% (<i>n</i> = 42). Of the total, 17% (<i>n</i> = 10) required component revision at a mean of 24 months (4x prosthesis loosening, 3x infection, 3x periprosthetic fracture). Forward elevation improved from 45° ± 27° to 59° ± 29° (P = 0.0056), abduction from 43° ± 29° to 55° ± 26° (P = 0.034) and external rotation from 8° ± 11° to 16° ± 14° (P = 0.031). OSS improved from 15 ± 8 to 29 ± 9 (P = 0.0009), SSV from 18 ± 16 to 62 ± 23 (P < 0.0001), and pain score from 8 ± 2 to 2 ± 2 (P < 0.0001). 88% of patients would undergo the procedure again.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CAD-CAM TSR is reserved for complex cases involving severe glenoid bone loss, offering significant improvements in pain and function with overall positive patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48451,"journal":{"name":"American Political Science Review","volume":"96 1","pages":"390-396"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732231193285","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glenoid bone loss represents a challenge in shoulder arthroplasty and often precludes standard implants. The CAD-CAM total shoulder replacement (TSR) is an option in these cases. This study aimed to assess survivorship and long-term patient outcomes of the CAD-CAM TSR.

Methods: Fifty-eight patients that underwent a CAD-CAM TSR by three surgeons at a single tertiary referral centre between 2009 and 2017 were reviewed. The mean follow-up was 70 months (28-130). Data was collected on survivorship, range of movement, Oxford shoulder score (OSS, 0-48), subjective shoulder value (SSV, 0-100%), pain score (0-10), and overall patient satisfaction.

Results: CAD-CAM TSR was undertaken as a primary procedure in 28% (n = 16) for end-stage arthritis with severe glenoid bone loss, and as a revision procedure in 72% (n = 42). Of the total, 17% (n = 10) required component revision at a mean of 24 months (4x prosthesis loosening, 3x infection, 3x periprosthetic fracture). Forward elevation improved from 45° ± 27° to 59° ± 29° (P = 0.0056), abduction from 43° ± 29° to 55° ± 26° (P = 0.034) and external rotation from 8° ± 11° to 16° ± 14° (P = 0.031). OSS improved from 15 ± 8 to 29 ± 9 (P = 0.0009), SSV from 18 ± 16 to 62 ± 23 (P < 0.0001), and pain score from 8 ± 2 to 2 ± 2 (P < 0.0001). 88% of patients would undergo the procedure again.

Conclusion: CAD-CAM TSR is reserved for complex cases involving severe glenoid bone loss, offering significant improvements in pain and function with overall positive patient satisfaction.

CAD-CAM 全肩关节置换术的存活率分析。
背景:盂骨缺失是肩关节置换术中的一个难题,通常无法使用标准植入物。CAD-CAM 全肩关节置换术(TSR)是这些病例的一种选择。本研究旨在评估 CAD-CAM TSR 的存活率和患者的长期疗效:研究回顾了 2009 年至 2017 年间在一家三级转诊中心由三位外科医生实施 CAD-CAM TSR 的 58 例患者。平均随访时间为 70 个月(28-130 个月)。收集的数据包括存活率、活动范围、牛津肩关节评分(OSS,0-48分)、肩关节主观值(SSV,0-100%)、疼痛评分(0-10分)和患者总体满意度:28%(16 人)的终末期关节炎患者因严重盂骨缺损而接受了 CAD-CAM TSR 作为主要手术,72%(42 人)的患者接受了翻修手术。其中,17%的患者(n = 10)在平均24个月后需要进行假体翻修(4次假体松动、3次感染、3次假体周围骨折)。前伸从 45° ± 27° 提高到 59° ± 29° (P = 0.0056),外展从 43° ± 29° 提高到 55° ± 26° (P = 0.034),外旋从 8° ± 11° 提高到 16° ± 14° (P = 0.031)。OSS从15±8°提高到29±9°(P = 0.0009),SSV从18±16°提高到62±23°(P = 0.034):CAD-CAM TSR 适用于涉及严重盂骨缺失的复杂病例,可显著改善疼痛和功能,患者总体满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: American Political Science Review is political science''s premier scholarly research journal, providing peer-reviewed articles and review essays from subfields throughout the discipline. Areas covered include political theory, American politics, public policy, public administration, comparative politics, and international relations. APSR has published continuously since 1906. American Political Science Review is sold ONLY as part of a joint subscription with Perspectives on Politics and PS: Political Science & Politics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信