Prologue: The Future of Rehabilitation Counseling Professional Associations

B. Phillips, E. Boland, Yolanda V. Edwards, Stephen A. Zanskas
{"title":"Prologue: The Future of Rehabilitation Counseling Professional Associations","authors":"B. Phillips, E. Boland, Yolanda V. Edwards, Stephen A. Zanskas","doi":"10.52017/001c.37928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional associations are the primary instrument for meeting the interests of a profession. However, the steady decline of membership that began in the 1970s in rehabilitation counseling associations has reduced their resources and limited their ability to advocate for the discipline (Phillips & Leahy, 2012). In 1981, in the early years of membership decline, the Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling published a special issue focusing on the potential consolidation of rehabilitation counseling associations. The special issue concluded with a call to survey rehabilitation counselors for their perspectives on the topic (Emener, 1981). Despite the special issue becoming the “benchmark publication” intended (Field & Emener, 1981, p. 59), no decisive action was taken following its publication and no survey conducted. In the articles that follow, we present information about the current and future state of rehabilitation counseling professional associations, relying heavily on the quantitative and qualitative responses of 2,608 rehabilitation counseling professionals. More concisely, this special issue finally answers the call from over 40 years ago to seek the input of rehabilitation counselors on the question of consolidation. In addition to introducing the articles in this special issue, we provide a historical sketch of rehabilitation counseling associations and membership trends that is key to understanding the debate around consolidation.","PeriodicalId":92715,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation counselors and educators journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation counselors and educators journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52017/001c.37928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Professional associations are the primary instrument for meeting the interests of a profession. However, the steady decline of membership that began in the 1970s in rehabilitation counseling associations has reduced their resources and limited their ability to advocate for the discipline (Phillips & Leahy, 2012). In 1981, in the early years of membership decline, the Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling published a special issue focusing on the potential consolidation of rehabilitation counseling associations. The special issue concluded with a call to survey rehabilitation counselors for their perspectives on the topic (Emener, 1981). Despite the special issue becoming the “benchmark publication” intended (Field & Emener, 1981, p. 59), no decisive action was taken following its publication and no survey conducted. In the articles that follow, we present information about the current and future state of rehabilitation counseling professional associations, relying heavily on the quantitative and qualitative responses of 2,608 rehabilitation counseling professionals. More concisely, this special issue finally answers the call from over 40 years ago to seek the input of rehabilitation counselors on the question of consolidation. In addition to introducing the articles in this special issue, we provide a historical sketch of rehabilitation counseling associations and membership trends that is key to understanding the debate around consolidation.
前言:康复咨询专业协会的未来
专业协会是满足专业利益的主要工具。然而,从20世纪70年代开始,康复咨询协会的会员数量稳步下降,减少了他们的资源,限制了他们倡导这一学科的能力(Phillips & Leahy, 2012)。1981年,在会员人数下降的最初几年,《应用康复咨询杂志》(Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling)出版了一期专刊,重点关注康复咨询协会的潜在整合。这期特刊最后呼吁调查康复咨询师对这个话题的看法(Emener, 1981)。尽管特刊有意成为“基准出版物”(Field & Emener, 1981, p. 59),但在其出版后没有采取果断行动,也没有进行调查。在接下来的文章中,我们在很大程度上依赖于2,608名康复咨询专业人员的定量和定性回应,介绍了康复咨询专业协会的现状和未来状况。更简单地说,这期特刊最终回应了40多年前寻求康复咨询师对巩固问题的投入。除了介绍本期特刊中的文章外,我们还提供了康复咨询协会和会员趋势的历史概况,这是理解围绕巩固的辩论的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信