Rehabilitation of communication in people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of types of intervention and therapeutic ingredients (Rehabilitación de la comunicación en personas con traumatismo encefalocraneal: una revisión sistemática de tipos de intervención e ingredientes terapéutico

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Tobar-Fredes, C. Salas
{"title":"Rehabilitation of communication in people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of types of intervention and therapeutic ingredients (Rehabilitación de la comunicación en personas con traumatismo encefalocraneal: una revisión sistemática de tipos de intervención e ingredientes terapéutico","authors":"R. Tobar-Fredes, C. Salas","doi":"10.1080/02109395.2021.2009292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: the treatment of cognitive-communication disorder (CCD) has proven an adequate approach to the social well-being of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Objective: describe the types of treatment and therapeutic ingredients — and their effectiveness — available for the direct treatment of CCD in people with TBI. Method: a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was carried out. The effectiveness of each type of treatment and the therapeutic ingredients available were assessed. Results: 22 articles met inclusion criteria. Three interventions (rehabilitation of emotional perception-regulation and social cognitive skills, pragmatic skills and conversation/interaction) achieved recommendation A. All therapeutic ingredients (education, functional goals, progressive approach, modelling, skills practice, feedback, simulation, practice with peers, emotional adjustment) had sufficient evidence for recommendation level A. Conclusions: direct communication treatment is an effective approach for people with brain injury and should be included as a practice standard. The need to develop a generic model to treat CCD that combines therapeutic ingredients from diverse interventions is discussed.","PeriodicalId":41002,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Psychology-Psikoloji Calismalari Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Psychology-Psikoloji Calismalari Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2021.2009292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: the treatment of cognitive-communication disorder (CCD) has proven an adequate approach to the social well-being of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Objective: describe the types of treatment and therapeutic ingredients — and their effectiveness — available for the direct treatment of CCD in people with TBI. Method: a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was carried out. The effectiveness of each type of treatment and the therapeutic ingredients available were assessed. Results: 22 articles met inclusion criteria. Three interventions (rehabilitation of emotional perception-regulation and social cognitive skills, pragmatic skills and conversation/interaction) achieved recommendation A. All therapeutic ingredients (education, functional goals, progressive approach, modelling, skills practice, feedback, simulation, practice with peers, emotional adjustment) had sufficient evidence for recommendation level A. Conclusions: direct communication treatment is an effective approach for people with brain injury and should be included as a practice standard. The need to develop a generic model to treat CCD that combines therapeutic ingredients from diverse interventions is discussed.
创伤性脑损伤患者的沟通康复:干预类型和治疗成分的系统综述(西班牙语)
背景:认知沟通障碍(CCD)的治疗已被证明是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者社会福祉的适当途径。目的:描述可用于直接治疗TBI患者CCD的治疗类型和治疗成分及其有效性。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。评估了每种治疗方法的有效性和可用的治疗成分。结果:22篇文章符合纳入标准。三项干预措施(情绪感知调节和社会认知技能康复、语用技能和会话/互动)均达到推荐a级。所有治疗成分(教育、功能目标、渐进式方法、建模、技能练习、反馈、模拟、同伴练习、情绪调节)均有足够证据支持推荐a级。直接沟通治疗是脑损伤患者的有效治疗方法,应纳入实践标准。讨论了开发一种综合多种干预措施治疗成分的治疗CCD的通用模型的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信