Rehabilitation of communication in people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of types of intervention and therapeutic ingredients (Rehabilitación de la comunicación en personas con traumatismo encefalocraneal: una revisión sistemática de tipos de intervención e ingredientes terapéutico
{"title":"Rehabilitation of communication in people with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of types of intervention and therapeutic ingredients (Rehabilitación de la comunicación en personas con traumatismo encefalocraneal: una revisión sistemática de tipos de intervención e ingredientes terapéutico","authors":"R. Tobar-Fredes, C. Salas","doi":"10.1080/02109395.2021.2009292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: the treatment of cognitive-communication disorder (CCD) has proven an adequate approach to the social well-being of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Objective: describe the types of treatment and therapeutic ingredients — and their effectiveness — available for the direct treatment of CCD in people with TBI. Method: a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was carried out. The effectiveness of each type of treatment and the therapeutic ingredients available were assessed. Results: 22 articles met inclusion criteria. Three interventions (rehabilitation of emotional perception-regulation and social cognitive skills, pragmatic skills and conversation/interaction) achieved recommendation A. All therapeutic ingredients (education, functional goals, progressive approach, modelling, skills practice, feedback, simulation, practice with peers, emotional adjustment) had sufficient evidence for recommendation level A. Conclusions: direct communication treatment is an effective approach for people with brain injury and should be included as a practice standard. The need to develop a generic model to treat CCD that combines therapeutic ingredients from diverse interventions is discussed.","PeriodicalId":41002,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Psychology-Psikoloji Calismalari Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Psychology-Psikoloji Calismalari Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2021.2009292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background: the treatment of cognitive-communication disorder (CCD) has proven an adequate approach to the social well-being of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Objective: describe the types of treatment and therapeutic ingredients — and their effectiveness — available for the direct treatment of CCD in people with TBI. Method: a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was carried out. The effectiveness of each type of treatment and the therapeutic ingredients available were assessed. Results: 22 articles met inclusion criteria. Three interventions (rehabilitation of emotional perception-regulation and social cognitive skills, pragmatic skills and conversation/interaction) achieved recommendation A. All therapeutic ingredients (education, functional goals, progressive approach, modelling, skills practice, feedback, simulation, practice with peers, emotional adjustment) had sufficient evidence for recommendation level A. Conclusions: direct communication treatment is an effective approach for people with brain injury and should be included as a practice standard. The need to develop a generic model to treat CCD that combines therapeutic ingredients from diverse interventions is discussed.