Intraoperative Radiation Exposure of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Mismatch Between Concerns and Protection

A. Joeris, S. Goldhahn, V. Kalampoki, F. Gebhard
{"title":"Intraoperative Radiation Exposure of Orthopaedic Surgeons-Mismatch Between Concerns and Protection","authors":"A. Joeris, S. Goldhahn, V. Kalampoki, F. Gebhard","doi":"10.4172/2329-6879.1000273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Although orthopaedic surgeons frequently utilize intraoperative imaging, there is a lack of knowledge about their patterns of radiation protection. The goal of this study was thus to fill this gap by evaluating the use of protection against radiation in relation to concerns, safety guidelines and instructions. Methods: A survey addressing the issue was performed in 531 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons. The questionnaire comprised 26 questions concerning the use of intraoperative radiation in clinical practice, concerns about it and protection against. Results: Over 31% of the surgeons are very concerned about their radiation exposure in their job and about 48% are slightly to moderately concerned. Surgeons from Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East are significantly more concerned about radiation in their job compared to European surgeons (p<0.002). However, only one fifth of the surgeons wear a dosimeter and half of them never use it. Nearly 65% of the surgeons always wear a lead apron, but only 30.8% wear a thyroid protection. Lead gloves and lead glasses were always worn by only 2.5 % (13/531) and 3.1% (16/531) respectively. Half of the respondents are aware of the radiation protection officer in their clinic, but 38.8% stated the issue has never been the subject of training at their institution. Internal training significantly affects the usage of dosimeters (odds ratio=2.97, 95% confidence interval: 2.00 – 4.39; p<0.001). Conclusion: Although most operating surgeons worry about their exposure, the knowledge and the practical implementation of radiological protection measures in clinical practice is still insufficient. Education is key for better radiation protection in orthopaedic practice.","PeriodicalId":19397,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","volume":"175 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.1000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective: Although orthopaedic surgeons frequently utilize intraoperative imaging, there is a lack of knowledge about their patterns of radiation protection. The goal of this study was thus to fill this gap by evaluating the use of protection against radiation in relation to concerns, safety guidelines and instructions. Methods: A survey addressing the issue was performed in 531 orthopaedic and trauma surgeons. The questionnaire comprised 26 questions concerning the use of intraoperative radiation in clinical practice, concerns about it and protection against. Results: Over 31% of the surgeons are very concerned about their radiation exposure in their job and about 48% are slightly to moderately concerned. Surgeons from Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East are significantly more concerned about radiation in their job compared to European surgeons (p<0.002). However, only one fifth of the surgeons wear a dosimeter and half of them never use it. Nearly 65% of the surgeons always wear a lead apron, but only 30.8% wear a thyroid protection. Lead gloves and lead glasses were always worn by only 2.5 % (13/531) and 3.1% (16/531) respectively. Half of the respondents are aware of the radiation protection officer in their clinic, but 38.8% stated the issue has never been the subject of training at their institution. Internal training significantly affects the usage of dosimeters (odds ratio=2.97, 95% confidence interval: 2.00 – 4.39; p<0.001). Conclusion: Although most operating surgeons worry about their exposure, the knowledge and the practical implementation of radiological protection measures in clinical practice is still insufficient. Education is key for better radiation protection in orthopaedic practice.
骨科医生术中辐射暴露——关注与保护的错位
目的:尽管骨科医生经常使用术中成像,但对其辐射防护模式缺乏了解。因此,这项研究的目的是通过评价与关注、安全准则和指示有关的辐射防护措施的使用情况来填补这一空白。方法:对531名骨科创伤外科医生进行调查。调查问卷包含26个问题,涉及术中放疗在临床中的应用、对术中放疗的关注和防护。结果:超过31%的外科医生对其工作中的辐射暴露非常担心,约48%的外科医生对其工作中的辐射暴露有轻微到中度的担忧。与欧洲外科医生相比,来自亚太、拉丁美洲和中东的外科医生对工作中的辐射的关注程度明显更高(p<0.002)。然而,只有五分之一的外科医生佩戴剂量计,其中一半从不使用。近65%的外科医生总是戴铅围裙,但只有30.8%的医生戴甲状腺保护装置。佩戴含铅手套和含铅眼镜的比例分别为2.5%(13/531)和3.1%(16/531)。一半的受访者知道他们诊所的辐射防护人员,但38.8%的人表示他们的机构从未对这个问题进行过培训。内部训练显著影响剂量计的使用(优势比=2.97,95%可信区间:2.00 - 4.39;p < 0.001)。结论:虽然大多数外科医生担心自己受到辐射,但在临床实践中对放射防护措施的认识和实际执行仍然不足。教育是提高骨科放射防护水平的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信