A novel method for early detection of MIC value – Broth dilution using indicator solution versus agar dilution: an original article

Rohon Das Roy, Subhayan Das Gupta
{"title":"A novel method for early detection of MIC value – Broth dilution using indicator solution versus agar dilution: an original article","authors":"Rohon Das Roy, Subhayan Das Gupta","doi":"10.34172/jrcm.2022.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The adequate protocol for treatment of an infection is often determined on the basis of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the causative organism. Traditional methods (agar dilution, microbroth dilution, and gradient diffusion) are labour intensive and time consuming (they are usually take over 48 hours to report the results). On the other hand, automated systems (VITEK™, Phoenix™, MicroScan WalkAway™) and rapid methods of MIC detection (using dielectrophoresis (DEP), magnetic bead rotation sensors and microfluidic incubation) require expensive instruments. This study is aimed to develop a rapid MIC detection method with the ability to applied to a resource limited setting. Methods: Agar dilution method and a novel broth dilution method (containing indicator solution) were simultaneously performed using amikacin, ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, cefoxitin and azithromycin. Results: Isolates of Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp, Klebsiella spp, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis, Acinetobacter spp and Pseudomonas spp were used. The MIC values for Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus isolates for each antibiotic were obtained within 4 to 5 hours by a novel broth dilution method. The obtained MIC values were corresponded with the MIC shown on the following day by agar dilution method. Conclusion: Broth dilution method with indicator solution is effective in rapid determination of the MIC for cephalosporins, penicillin, carbapenems, cephamycin, aminoglycosides and macrolides for most isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus. Unfortunately this method did not work for the non-fermenter group of organisms like Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp, as their results could not be obtained before 24 hours. The method is time saving, relatively inexpensive and is applicable to resource limited settings.","PeriodicalId":17071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jrcm.2022.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The adequate protocol for treatment of an infection is often determined on the basis of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the causative organism. Traditional methods (agar dilution, microbroth dilution, and gradient diffusion) are labour intensive and time consuming (they are usually take over 48 hours to report the results). On the other hand, automated systems (VITEK™, Phoenix™, MicroScan WalkAway™) and rapid methods of MIC detection (using dielectrophoresis (DEP), magnetic bead rotation sensors and microfluidic incubation) require expensive instruments. This study is aimed to develop a rapid MIC detection method with the ability to applied to a resource limited setting. Methods: Agar dilution method and a novel broth dilution method (containing indicator solution) were simultaneously performed using amikacin, ceftriaxone, piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, cefoxitin and azithromycin. Results: Isolates of Escherichia coli, Enterobacter spp, Klebsiella spp, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis, Acinetobacter spp and Pseudomonas spp were used. The MIC values for Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus isolates for each antibiotic were obtained within 4 to 5 hours by a novel broth dilution method. The obtained MIC values were corresponded with the MIC shown on the following day by agar dilution method. Conclusion: Broth dilution method with indicator solution is effective in rapid determination of the MIC for cephalosporins, penicillin, carbapenems, cephamycin, aminoglycosides and macrolides for most isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and S. aureus. Unfortunately this method did not work for the non-fermenter group of organisms like Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp, as their results could not be obtained before 24 hours. The method is time saving, relatively inexpensive and is applicable to resource limited settings.
早期检测MIC值的新方法——指示剂溶液与琼脂稀释的肉汤稀释:一篇原创文章
引言:治疗感染的适当方案通常是根据病原菌的最低抑制浓度(MIC)确定的。传统的方法(琼脂稀释、微肉汤稀释和梯度扩散)是劳动密集型和耗时的(通常需要48小时以上才能报告结果)。另一方面,自动化系统(VITEK™,Phoenix™,MicroScan WalkAway™)和快速MIC检测方法(使用dielectrophoresis (DEP),磁珠旋转传感器和微流体培养)需要昂贵的仪器。本研究旨在开发一种能够应用于资源有限环境的快速MIC检测方法。方法:用阿米卡星、头孢曲松、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦、亚胺培南、头孢西丁、阿奇霉素,同时采用琼脂稀释法和新型肉汤稀释法(含指示剂溶液)。结果:检出大肠杆菌、肠杆菌、克雷伯氏菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、奇异变形杆菌、不动杆菌和假单胞菌。采用新型肉汤稀释法,在4 ~ 5小时内获得肠杆菌科和金黄色葡萄球菌分离物对每种抗生素的MIC值。所得MIC值与隔天琼脂稀释法所得MIC值一致。结论:指示液肉汤稀释法可快速测定大多数肠杆菌科和金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中头孢菌素、青霉素、碳青霉烯类、头孢霉素、氨基糖苷类和大环内酯类药物的MIC。不幸的是,这种方法不适用于非发酵组的生物,如假单胞菌和不动杆菌,因为它们的结果不能在24小时前得到。该方法节省时间,相对便宜,适用于资源有限的设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信