Education Reform: What Is Really Achieved by Trying to Close Achievement Gaps?

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
John Schlueter
{"title":"Education Reform: What Is Really Achieved by Trying to Close Achievement Gaps?","authors":"John Schlueter","doi":"10.5195/rt.2021.859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I trace the history of the substitution of education reform for economic reform in order to ask, and answer, this question: why do we continue to imagine that (higher) education is where we, finally, achieve equality?  The substitution of education reform for economic reform begins in the early 1960’s with the landmark “Coleman Report.”  I argue that this report, and others that followed, show conclusively that economic inequality simply reproduces itself, and no amount of educational reform can make up for its devastating effects.  However, at this very same time, education reformers begin to believe that educational “achievement” is the cause of increased economic opportunity and equality, rather than an effect of (un)equal economic status.  This confusion of cause and effect not only distracts us from meaningful economic reform, it also puts tremendous pressure on teachers and institutions. Finally, and fatally, substituting educational reform for economic reform remakes equality itself into something that is earned rather than given. ","PeriodicalId":42678,"journal":{"name":"Radical Teacher","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2021.859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, I trace the history of the substitution of education reform for economic reform in order to ask, and answer, this question: why do we continue to imagine that (higher) education is where we, finally, achieve equality?  The substitution of education reform for economic reform begins in the early 1960’s with the landmark “Coleman Report.”  I argue that this report, and others that followed, show conclusively that economic inequality simply reproduces itself, and no amount of educational reform can make up for its devastating effects.  However, at this very same time, education reformers begin to believe that educational “achievement” is the cause of increased economic opportunity and equality, rather than an effect of (un)equal economic status.  This confusion of cause and effect not only distracts us from meaningful economic reform, it also puts tremendous pressure on teachers and institutions. Finally, and fatally, substituting educational reform for economic reform remakes equality itself into something that is earned rather than given. 
教育改革:缩小成绩差距到底能取得什么成果?
在这篇文章中,我追溯了教育改革取代经济改革的历史,以便提出并回答这个问题:为什么我们继续想象(高等)教育是我们最终实现平等的地方?教育改革取代经济改革始于20世纪60年代初具有里程碑意义的“科尔曼报告”。我认为,这份报告以及随后的其他报告确凿地表明,经济不平等只会自我复制,再多的教育改革也无法弥补其破坏性影响。然而,与此同时,教育改革者开始相信教育“成就”是增加经济机会和平等的原因,而不是(不)平等经济地位的结果。这种因果的混淆不仅分散了我们对有意义的经济改革的注意力,也给教师和机构带来了巨大的压力。最后,也是致命的一点是,用教育改革取代经济改革,会让平等本身变成一种挣来的东西,而不是给予的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radical Teacher
Radical Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信