Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dan Remedialnya Dalam Mengerjakan Soal Cerita Perbandingan Matematika

Melania Eva Wulanningtyas, Nafida Hetty Marhaeni
{"title":"Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dan Remedialnya Dalam Mengerjakan Soal Cerita Perbandingan Matematika","authors":"Melania Eva Wulanningtyas, Nafida Hetty Marhaeni","doi":"10.25273/JIPM.V10I2.10114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem solving mathematics error in a matter of story on ratio material worth and turn around values still often occur, so we need a remedial program to minimize these errors. For this reason, this study aims to determine the types of errors, remedial program steps and types of errors after the remedial program. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with the data collection method uses tests, interviews, and personal documents. The study was conducted at eighth grade of SMP Pangudi Luhur 1 Yogyakarta. This study applies a layered validation strategy in the form of triangulation techniques, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and the involvement of resource persons and experts. The results showed that the dominant error in the form of an error did not understand the command problem with a percentage of 43%, the error shown if every step taken by students was correct but the final result given was not a solution done with a percentage of 80% and a calculation error with a percentage of 20%. After the results are obtained remediation efforts are made. Based on the remediation results that have been made, there is a decrease in 3 categories of dominant student errors, namely mistakes not understanding the question command to a percentage of 31%, errors that are shown if each step taken by students is correct but the end result given is not a completion done to 60%. Thus, the remediation program makes fewer types of mistakes made by students than before remediation","PeriodicalId":31874,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25273/JIPM.V10I2.10114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem solving mathematics error in a matter of story on ratio material worth and turn around values still often occur, so we need a remedial program to minimize these errors. For this reason, this study aims to determine the types of errors, remedial program steps and types of errors after the remedial program. This research is a qualitative descriptive study with the data collection method uses tests, interviews, and personal documents. The study was conducted at eighth grade of SMP Pangudi Luhur 1 Yogyakarta. This study applies a layered validation strategy in the form of triangulation techniques, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and the involvement of resource persons and experts. The results showed that the dominant error in the form of an error did not understand the command problem with a percentage of 43%, the error shown if every step taken by students was correct but the final result given was not a solution done with a percentage of 80% and a calculation error with a percentage of 20%. After the results are obtained remediation efforts are made. Based on the remediation results that have been made, there is a decrease in 3 categories of dominant student errors, namely mistakes not understanding the question command to a percentage of 31%, errors that are shown if each step taken by students is correct but the end result given is not a completion done to 60%. Thus, the remediation program makes fewer types of mistakes made by students than before remediation
分析学生的错误,并在处理比较数学故事时进行补救
在解题数学中,关于配比材料价值和周转价值的错误仍然经常发生,因此我们需要一个补救程序来尽量减少这些错误。因此,本研究旨在确定错误的类型、补救方案步骤和补救方案后的错误类型。本研究是一项定性描述性研究,数据收集方法采用测试、访谈和个人文件。这项研究是在日惹邦古地路1中学八年级进行的。本研究采用分层验证策略,以三角测量技术、焦点小组讨论(FGD)和资源人员和专家的参与为形式。结果表明,占主导地位的错误形式是不理解命令问题,错误的比例为43%,如果学生采取的每一步都是正确的,但最终给出的结果不是80%的解决方案,计算错误的比例为20%。取得结果后,进行补救工作。根据已经完成的补救结果,学生的主要错误有三类,即不理解问题命令的错误减少到31%,如果学生每一步都是正确的,但最终给出的结果没有完成,则显示错误到60%。因此,在补习程序中,学生犯的错误种类比补习前减少了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信