Tracking Tumours into Number Community? – Yes, How and Why

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: Tumours are growths (of quantity) in humans with medical science literature. Isodigitals produced by pre-emptive multiplication are also growths (of quantity) in numbers with slight numeration science literature for now. The developer of inchoate numeration science literature somehow acquainted with the literature of tumours, upon encountering isodigitals would be prompted to surmise isodigitals as phenotypes (lookalikes) of tumours and be urged to explore their literatures for prospects of relationship between the two. Methodology and theoretical Orientation: Tumours and isodigitals are subjected to pentadic characterization with the five parameters of identity, structure, function, operation and application for methodology. The theoretical orientation of the method is that tumours and isodigitals as growths of quantity are classic examples of quantity which is defined as the phenomenal medium of manifestation of all things, whether material or non-material. So, the two can be compared and contrasted at will in the interest of science. Findings: Numeration science literature on isodigitals can borrow mode of classification of tumours from medical science literature on tumours, while medical science literature on tumours can borrow verbal formulary for the description of pattern of growth of tumours from numeration science literature on isodigitals. Conclusion and Significance: Tumours in humans and isodigitals in numbers are seen as phenotypes subsisting on manifestation of quantity. The peculiarities of one can serve as clues to the probing of the other for more light. Recommendations: The ideal of insight on quantity should be brought to bear on scientific engagements.