The Concept of “Internal Colonization” and Its Application in a Comparative Analysis of (Post)Soviet States

R. Čepaitienė
{"title":"The Concept of “Internal Colonization” and Its Application in a Comparative Analysis of (Post)Soviet States","authors":"R. Čepaitienė","doi":"10.15388/SOCMINTVEI.2018.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses a direction of sociocultural studies – the cultural history of natural resources – and the possibilities of its application in examining the causes of inequality and social exclusion in post-Soviet Lithuania. This theoretical-methodological approach assumes a strong interdependence shared between the extraction of natural resources, a state’s political system and institutions as well as certain sociocultural provisions. In exploring the concept of “internal colonization,” developed by historian of culture Alexander Etkind and other authors, this article sets guidelines for a comparative analysis of the sociopolitical structure of post-Soviet countries (especially Russia and Lithuania). Some initial hypotheses regarding the trends, differences, and similarities of post-Soviet societies in the long historical perspective, from the 16th century up to our time, are presented for further analysis. This article concludes that this methodological approach could be sufficiently promising in explaining the specifics of the socioeconomic development of independent Lithuania, in particular by applying the hypothesis of a “secondary internal colonization,” which has been raised during the course of the investigation.","PeriodicalId":33062,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija Mintis ir Veiksmas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija Mintis ir Veiksmas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/SOCMINTVEI.2018.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses a direction of sociocultural studies – the cultural history of natural resources – and the possibilities of its application in examining the causes of inequality and social exclusion in post-Soviet Lithuania. This theoretical-methodological approach assumes a strong interdependence shared between the extraction of natural resources, a state’s political system and institutions as well as certain sociocultural provisions. In exploring the concept of “internal colonization,” developed by historian of culture Alexander Etkind and other authors, this article sets guidelines for a comparative analysis of the sociopolitical structure of post-Soviet countries (especially Russia and Lithuania). Some initial hypotheses regarding the trends, differences, and similarities of post-Soviet societies in the long historical perspective, from the 16th century up to our time, are presented for further analysis. This article concludes that this methodological approach could be sufficiently promising in explaining the specifics of the socioeconomic development of independent Lithuania, in particular by applying the hypothesis of a “secondary internal colonization,” which has been raised during the course of the investigation.
“内部殖民”概念及其在(后)苏联国家比较分析中的应用
本文讨论了社会文化研究的一个方向-自然资源的文化史-及其在检查后苏联立陶宛不平等和社会排斥的原因方面应用的可能性。这种理论方法假设自然资源的开采、国家的政治制度和机构以及某些社会文化规定之间存在强烈的相互依存关系。在探索由文化历史学家亚历山大·埃特金(Alexander Etkind)和其他作者提出的“内部殖民”概念时,本文为后苏联国家(特别是俄罗斯和立陶宛)的社会政治结构的比较分析设定了指导方针。从长远的历史角度来看,从16世纪到我们这个时代,关于后苏联社会的趋势、差异和相似之处,提出了一些初步假设,以供进一步分析。本文的结论是,这种方法方法在解释独立立陶宛的社会经济发展细节方面可能足够有希望,特别是通过应用在调查过程中提出的“二次内部殖民化”假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信