Convergence Rate Analysis for Optimal Computing Budget Allocation Algorithms

Yanwen Li, Siyang Gao
{"title":"Convergence Rate Analysis for Optimal Computing Budget Allocation Algorithms","authors":"Yanwen Li, Siyang Gao","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2211.14722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ordinal optimization (OO) is a widely-studied technique for optimizing discrete-event dynamic systems (DEDS). It evaluates the performance of the system designs in a finite set by sampling and aims to correctly make ordinal comparison of the designs. A well-known method in OO is the optimal computing budget allocation (OCBA). It builds the optimality conditions for the number of samples allocated to each design, and the sample allocation that satisfies the optimality conditions is shown to asymptotically maximize the probability of correct selection for the best design. In this paper, we investigate two popular OCBA algorithms. With known variances for samples of each design, we characterize their convergence rates with respect to different performance measures. We first demonstrate that the two OCBA algorithms achieve the optimal convergence rate under measures of probability of correct selection and expected opportunity cost. It fills the void of convergence analysis for OCBA algorithms. Next, we extend our analysis to the measure of cumulative regret, a main measure studied in the field of machine learning. We show that with minor modification, the two OCBA algorithms can reach the optimal convergence rate under cumulative regret. It indicates the potential of broader use of algorithms designed based on the OCBA optimality conditions.","PeriodicalId":13196,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ordinal optimization (OO) is a widely-studied technique for optimizing discrete-event dynamic systems (DEDS). It evaluates the performance of the system designs in a finite set by sampling and aims to correctly make ordinal comparison of the designs. A well-known method in OO is the optimal computing budget allocation (OCBA). It builds the optimality conditions for the number of samples allocated to each design, and the sample allocation that satisfies the optimality conditions is shown to asymptotically maximize the probability of correct selection for the best design. In this paper, we investigate two popular OCBA algorithms. With known variances for samples of each design, we characterize their convergence rates with respect to different performance measures. We first demonstrate that the two OCBA algorithms achieve the optimal convergence rate under measures of probability of correct selection and expected opportunity cost. It fills the void of convergence analysis for OCBA algorithms. Next, we extend our analysis to the measure of cumulative regret, a main measure studied in the field of machine learning. We show that with minor modification, the two OCBA algorithms can reach the optimal convergence rate under cumulative regret. It indicates the potential of broader use of algorithms designed based on the OCBA optimality conditions.
最优计算预算分配算法的收敛率分析
有序优化(OO)是一种被广泛研究的离散事件动态系统优化技术。它通过抽样来评价系统设计在有限集合中的性能,目的是正确地对设计进行有序比较。面向对象中一个著名的方法是最优计算预算分配(OCBA)。建立了分配给每个设计的样本数量的最优性条件,并证明满足最优性条件的样本分配使最佳设计的正确选择概率渐近最大化。本文研究了两种流行的OCBA算法。在每个设计样本的已知方差下,我们描述了它们相对于不同性能度量的收敛率。我们首先证明了在正确选择概率和期望机会成本的度量下,两种OCBA算法都达到了最优收敛速度。它填补了OCBA算法收敛性分析的空白。接下来,我们将分析扩展到累积后悔的度量,这是机器学习领域研究的一个主要度量。结果表明,在累积遗憾情况下,两种OCBA算法只需稍加修改即可达到最优收敛速度。这表明基于OCBA最优性条件设计的算法具有广泛应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信