Pirra Jungku: Comparison of traditional and contemporary fire practices on Karajarri Country, Western Australia

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Edward M. J. Blackwood, Karajarri Rangers, Sam Bayley, Hamsini Bijlani, Rod J Fensham, Malcolm Lindsay, Ewan Noakes, Jackie Wemyss, Sarah Legge
{"title":"Pirra Jungku: Comparison of traditional and contemporary fire practices on Karajarri Country, Western Australia","authors":"Edward M. J. Blackwood,&nbsp;Karajarri Rangers,&nbsp;Sam Bayley,&nbsp;Hamsini Bijlani,&nbsp;Rod J Fensham,&nbsp;Malcolm Lindsay,&nbsp;Ewan Noakes,&nbsp;Jackie Wemyss,&nbsp;Sarah Legge","doi":"10.1111/emr.12527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional fire practices in Australia’s deserts may have created mosaics of post-fire seral stages that benefitted some plants and animals. Managing fire to emulate the patterns produced by traditional burning practices is a common objective in contemporary conservation planning in Australia’s deserts. However, the extent to which traditional burning in deserts affected fire regimes across space and time is contested. We aim to contribute to knowledge about the impacts of traditional burning on fire patterns in the Great Sandy Desert, northwest Australia. Our study covered the traditional lands of the Karajarri people, where some families were living a traditional lifestyle on Country until the 1960s. We analysed high-quality aerial photographs taken over 18,000 km<sup>2</sup> of Karajarri Country in the 1940s. Fire footprints up to several years old were mapped from these images, and their spatial characteristics were compared to those of contemporary fire regimes over the same area, visualised using high-resolution Sentinel satellite imagery. Fires in the 1940s (considered traditional) were more numerous but much smaller than contemporary (2016–2020) fires. The areal extent of recently burnt areas was smaller and the fire frequency was lower in the 1940s. Contemporary fire patterns around cultural sites differed little from fire patterns elsewhere in the landscape, possibly because people were burning over large areas rather than only at localised sites. Our study suggests that Karajarri influenced fire patterns at a landscape scale in the Great Sandy Desert, at least during periods of average rainfall. The findings are helping Karajarri refine fire management goals, for example, by informing the size and dispersion of future burns, and supporting community discussion about fire and culture. Fire management outcomes for plants and animals are being tracked with a biodiversity monitoring program.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 S1","pages":"83-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12527","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Traditional fire practices in Australia’s deserts may have created mosaics of post-fire seral stages that benefitted some plants and animals. Managing fire to emulate the patterns produced by traditional burning practices is a common objective in contemporary conservation planning in Australia’s deserts. However, the extent to which traditional burning in deserts affected fire regimes across space and time is contested. We aim to contribute to knowledge about the impacts of traditional burning on fire patterns in the Great Sandy Desert, northwest Australia. Our study covered the traditional lands of the Karajarri people, where some families were living a traditional lifestyle on Country until the 1960s. We analysed high-quality aerial photographs taken over 18,000 km2 of Karajarri Country in the 1940s. Fire footprints up to several years old were mapped from these images, and their spatial characteristics were compared to those of contemporary fire regimes over the same area, visualised using high-resolution Sentinel satellite imagery. Fires in the 1940s (considered traditional) were more numerous but much smaller than contemporary (2016–2020) fires. The areal extent of recently burnt areas was smaller and the fire frequency was lower in the 1940s. Contemporary fire patterns around cultural sites differed little from fire patterns elsewhere in the landscape, possibly because people were burning over large areas rather than only at localised sites. Our study suggests that Karajarri influenced fire patterns at a landscape scale in the Great Sandy Desert, at least during periods of average rainfall. The findings are helping Karajarri refine fire management goals, for example, by informing the size and dispersion of future burns, and supporting community discussion about fire and culture. Fire management outcomes for plants and animals are being tracked with a biodiversity monitoring program.

Abstract Image

Pirra Jungku:澳大利亚西部Karajarri地区传统与现代消防实践的比较
澳大利亚沙漠地区的传统生火方式可能创造了火灾后几个阶段的马赛克,使一些植物和动物受益。管理火灾以模仿传统燃烧做法产生的模式是澳大利亚沙漠当代保护规划的共同目标。然而,沙漠中传统的燃烧在多大程度上影响了跨越空间和时间的火灾制度是有争议的。我们的目标是为了解澳大利亚西北部大沙漠传统燃烧对火灾模式的影响做出贡献。我们的研究覆盖了Karajarri人的传统土地,那里的一些家庭直到20世纪60年代还过着传统的乡村生活方式。我们分析了20世纪40年代拍摄的Karajarri国家18000平方公里的高质量航空照片。根据这些图像绘制了几年前的火灾足迹,并将其空间特征与同一地区的当代火灾状况进行了比较,使用高分辨率哨兵卫星图像进行可视化。20世纪40年代的火灾(被认为是传统的)数量更多,但规模远小于当代(2016-2020年)的火灾。20世纪40年代,近期燃烧区域面积较小,火灾频率较低。文化遗址周围的当代火灾模式与其他地区的火灾模式几乎没有什么不同,可能是因为人们在大片地区燃烧,而不仅仅是在局部地区。我们的研究表明,Karajarri在大沙漠的景观尺度上影响了火灾模式,至少在平均降雨期间是这样。这些发现有助于Karajarri完善火灾管理目标,例如,通过告知未来火灾的规模和分布,以及支持社区关于火灾和文化的讨论。生物多样性监测项目正在跟踪植物和动物的火灾管理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信