Evaluation of Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods of Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori Infection in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

S. U. Ekesiobi, C. Azike, V. N. Agi, E. Nwoka, C. Nyenke, C. K. Wachukwu
{"title":"Evaluation of Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods of Diagnosing Helicobacter pylori Infection in Port Harcourt, Nigeria","authors":"S. U. Ekesiobi, C. Azike, V. N. Agi, E. Nwoka, C. Nyenke, C. K. Wachukwu","doi":"10.9734/jamb/2022/v22i12695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several diagnostic approaches are available for the detection of Helicobacter pylori The aim of this study was to evaluate the non-invasive and invasive methods of diagnosing H. pylori infections. A total of three hundred (300) samples each for stool and blood were subjected to non-invasive techniques. The invasive method used in this study was the polymerase chain reaction method (PCR) targeting the 16SrRNA from stool samples while the non-invasive methods used were stool antigen test, urea breath, and serology test. The amplified 16SrRNA fragments of H. pylori from various samples on agarose gel showed their bands at 380 base pairs.  Results obtained from this study showed that the PCR method recorded a 54% prevalence rate, the stool antigen test recorded a 13.7% prevalence rate while serology and urea breath test methods recorded a prevalence rate of 14.7% and 11.7% respectively. This study recorded a prevalence rate of 33.6% based on the study location, with females recording the highest prevalence rate in all the diagnostic methods used. The sensitivities of the various methods used against PCR were 90.3% for the stool antigen test method, 64.5% for the urea breath test, and 100% for the serology test method; while their specificities were 26.3% for both the stool antigen test and urea breathe test and 79% for serology test. The serology method showed a likelihood ratio of 4.76 while that of the stool antigen test and urea breath test were 2.354 and 0.462 respectively. In conclusion, this study has shown that the order of accuracy of diagnostic methods can be arranged as follows: PCR> serology > stool antigen test > urea breath test. However, the order might slightly change among related studies. Generally, the invasive method is preferred over the non-invasive method in developed countries while simultaneous use of more than one non-invasive method is encouraged in developing countries.","PeriodicalId":14918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Microbiology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jamb/2022/v22i12695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several diagnostic approaches are available for the detection of Helicobacter pylori The aim of this study was to evaluate the non-invasive and invasive methods of diagnosing H. pylori infections. A total of three hundred (300) samples each for stool and blood were subjected to non-invasive techniques. The invasive method used in this study was the polymerase chain reaction method (PCR) targeting the 16SrRNA from stool samples while the non-invasive methods used were stool antigen test, urea breath, and serology test. The amplified 16SrRNA fragments of H. pylori from various samples on agarose gel showed their bands at 380 base pairs.  Results obtained from this study showed that the PCR method recorded a 54% prevalence rate, the stool antigen test recorded a 13.7% prevalence rate while serology and urea breath test methods recorded a prevalence rate of 14.7% and 11.7% respectively. This study recorded a prevalence rate of 33.6% based on the study location, with females recording the highest prevalence rate in all the diagnostic methods used. The sensitivities of the various methods used against PCR were 90.3% for the stool antigen test method, 64.5% for the urea breath test, and 100% for the serology test method; while their specificities were 26.3% for both the stool antigen test and urea breathe test and 79% for serology test. The serology method showed a likelihood ratio of 4.76 while that of the stool antigen test and urea breath test were 2.354 and 0.462 respectively. In conclusion, this study has shown that the order of accuracy of diagnostic methods can be arranged as follows: PCR> serology > stool antigen test > urea breath test. However, the order might slightly change among related studies. Generally, the invasive method is preferred over the non-invasive method in developed countries while simultaneous use of more than one non-invasive method is encouraged in developing countries.
尼日利亚哈科特港有创和无创幽门螺杆菌感染诊断方法的评价
有几种诊断方法可用于检测幽门螺杆菌,本研究的目的是评估诊断幽门螺杆菌感染的非侵入性和侵入性方法。共有300个粪便和血液样本接受了非侵入性技术。本研究采用的有创方法为针对粪便样本中16SrRNA的聚合酶链反应法(PCR),无创方法为粪便抗原检测、尿素呼气检测、血清学检测。在琼脂糖凝胶上扩增不同样品的幽门螺杆菌16SrRNA片段,其条带长度为380个碱基对。本研究结果显示,PCR法检出率为54%,粪便抗原试验检出率为13.7%,血清学和尿素呼气试验检出率分别为14.7%和11.7%。根据研究地点,该研究记录的患病率为33.6%,在所有使用的诊断方法中,女性的患病率最高。不同方法对PCR的敏感性分别为粪便抗原试验90.3%、尿素呼气试验64.5%和血清学试验100%;粪便抗原试验和尿素呼吸试验的特异性为26.3%,血清学试验的特异性为79%。血清学方法的似然比为4.76,粪便抗原试验和尿素呼吸试验的似然比分别为2.354和0.462。综上所述,本研究表明,诊断方法的准确性排序为PCR>血清学>粪便抗原试验>尿素呼气试验。然而,相关研究的顺序可能略有变化。一般来说,发达国家更倾向于采用侵入性方法而非侵入性方法,而发展中国家则鼓励同时使用多种非侵入性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书