Aby Warburg y el pathos superviviente. De la psicología a la memoria social

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY

Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico Pub Date : 2020-08-21 DOI:10.7764/67.5

Daniela Losiggio

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work aims to restore the problem of the Warburg’s method. First, we will analyse the influence of Jacob Burckhardt and Robert Vischer in the Warburguian proposal of a psychology for the approach of cultural phenomena. Then, we will discover that Warburg moves from this approach towards a new concern for the way in which impersonal forces produce historical-cultural senses. As we propose here, on the one hand, this movement is mediated by the configuration of a critique towards aestheticism and historicism (made explicit in 1900 through a famous epistolary exchange with Andre Jolles); on the other hand, it allows a better understanding of the notion of surviving pathos as well as the Warburguian interest for developing a theory of social memory, influenced by Richard Semon.

查看原文本刊更多论文

目前的工作旨在恢复Warburg的方法的问题。首先，我们将分析Jacob Burckhardt和Robert Vischer在Warburguian关于研究文化现象的心理学建议中的影响。然后，我们将发现Warburg从这种方法转向了一种新的关注，即非个人力量产生历史文化感觉的方式。正如我们在这里提出的，一方面，这一运动是由对唯美主义和历史主义的批判的配置所调解的(在1900年通过与安德烈·乔勒的著名书信交流明确表示);另一方面，它可以让我们更好地理解生存悲情的概念，以及受理查德·西蒙(Richard Semon)影响的沃伯格(Warburguian)对发展社会记忆理论的兴趣。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 weeks

期刊介绍： The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.