{"title":"Evaluation of Homework in Science and Social Studies / Evaluacija domaće zadaće u Prirodi i društvu","authors":"Edita Borić","doi":"10.15516/CJE.V23I0.4055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic monitoring of students’ achievements as well as encouraging and improving the development of their knowledge, skills and abilities is one of the basic tasks of school. Apart from monitoring the progress of students during the teaching process, monitoring and evaluation of their independent work at home is also considered. A new approach to curriculum planning emphasizes the importance of formative evaluation, which implies monitoring and feedback about the learning process. A well-designed homework task can be an excellent indicator of progress in a student’s independent work outside of school. Creating and evaluating constructivist homework enables monitoring the development of students’ research skills as one of the two key evaluation elements in Science and Social Studies. The aim of the paper was to determine the frequency of homework evaluated by teachers and the ways teachers evaluate homework in Science and Social Studies classes. In addition, the aim was to identify the sources of homework which are mostly evaluated. A sample study included 83 primary school teachers, whose assignment, assessment and evaluation of student homework was observed by the students of the Faculty of Education in Osijek and Slavonski Brod during their professional-pedagogical practice. The study analysed 343 Science and Social Studies lessons in which homework was assigned. The results show that teachers did not evaluate a large amount of homework, or they only marked it as reviewed without any feedback about students’ progress and achievement. Therefore, the study reflects the importance of planning, creating and evaluating homework assignments in Science and Social Studies classes. Key words: curriculum; formative evaluation; homework assignments; learning outcomes; sources of homework --- Sustavno pracenje ucenickih postignuca, kao i poticanje i poboljsanje razvoja njihovih znanja, vjestina i sposobnosti, jedna je od osnovnih zadaca skole. Osim pracenja napretka ucenika tijekom procesa poucavanja, također smo razmotrili pracenje i evaluaciju samostalnoga rada ucenika kod kuce. Novi pristup planiranju kurikula naglasava važnost formativne evaluacije, sto obuhvaca pracenje i davanje povratnih informacija o procesu ucenja. Dobro osmisljena zadaca može biti odlican pokazatelj napretka u samostalnom radu ucenika izvan skole. Kreiranje i evaluacija konstruktivisticke domace zadace omogucuje pracenje razvoja ucenickih istraživackih vjestina kao jednog od kljucnih elemenata evaluacije u predmetu Priroda i drustvo. Cilj ovoga rada bio je utvrditi koliko cesto ucitelji evaluiraju domace zadace i nacine na koje to cine u nastavi Prirode i drustva. Osim toga, cilj je bio utvrditi koje izvore zadace ucitelji najvise evaluiraju. Uzorak studije obuhvatio je 83 osnovnoskolska ucitelja cije zadavanje domacega rada, procjenu i evaluaciju zadaca ucenika promatrali su studenti Fakulteta za odgoj i obrazovne znanosti u Osijeku i Slavonskom Brodu tijekom profesionalno-pedagoske prakse. U istraživanju su analizirana 343 sata Prirode i drustva na kojima je zadana domaca zadaca. Rezultati pokazuju da ucitelji nisu evaluirali veliki broj domacih zadaca ili su ih samo oznacili kao pregledane bez povratnih informacija o ucenickom napretku i postignucu. Stoga, istraživanje ukazuje na važnost planiranja, osmisljavanja i evaluacije zadataka domacega rada u nastavi Prirode i drustva. Kljucne rijeci: formativna evaluacija; ishodi ucenja; izvori domace zadace; kurikul; zadatci za domaci rad","PeriodicalId":44438,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I Obrazovanje","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15516/CJE.V23I0.4055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Systematic monitoring of students’ achievements as well as encouraging and improving the development of their knowledge, skills and abilities is one of the basic tasks of school. Apart from monitoring the progress of students during the teaching process, monitoring and evaluation of their independent work at home is also considered. A new approach to curriculum planning emphasizes the importance of formative evaluation, which implies monitoring and feedback about the learning process. A well-designed homework task can be an excellent indicator of progress in a student’s independent work outside of school. Creating and evaluating constructivist homework enables monitoring the development of students’ research skills as one of the two key evaluation elements in Science and Social Studies. The aim of the paper was to determine the frequency of homework evaluated by teachers and the ways teachers evaluate homework in Science and Social Studies classes. In addition, the aim was to identify the sources of homework which are mostly evaluated. A sample study included 83 primary school teachers, whose assignment, assessment and evaluation of student homework was observed by the students of the Faculty of Education in Osijek and Slavonski Brod during their professional-pedagogical practice. The study analysed 343 Science and Social Studies lessons in which homework was assigned. The results show that teachers did not evaluate a large amount of homework, or they only marked it as reviewed without any feedback about students’ progress and achievement. Therefore, the study reflects the importance of planning, creating and evaluating homework assignments in Science and Social Studies classes. Key words: curriculum; formative evaluation; homework assignments; learning outcomes; sources of homework --- Sustavno pracenje ucenickih postignuca, kao i poticanje i poboljsanje razvoja njihovih znanja, vjestina i sposobnosti, jedna je od osnovnih zadaca skole. Osim pracenja napretka ucenika tijekom procesa poucavanja, također smo razmotrili pracenje i evaluaciju samostalnoga rada ucenika kod kuce. Novi pristup planiranju kurikula naglasava važnost formativne evaluacije, sto obuhvaca pracenje i davanje povratnih informacija o procesu ucenja. Dobro osmisljena zadaca može biti odlican pokazatelj napretka u samostalnom radu ucenika izvan skole. Kreiranje i evaluacija konstruktivisticke domace zadace omogucuje pracenje razvoja ucenickih istraživackih vjestina kao jednog od kljucnih elemenata evaluacije u predmetu Priroda i drustvo. Cilj ovoga rada bio je utvrditi koliko cesto ucitelji evaluiraju domace zadace i nacine na koje to cine u nastavi Prirode i drustva. Osim toga, cilj je bio utvrditi koje izvore zadace ucitelji najvise evaluiraju. Uzorak studije obuhvatio je 83 osnovnoskolska ucitelja cije zadavanje domacega rada, procjenu i evaluaciju zadaca ucenika promatrali su studenti Fakulteta za odgoj i obrazovne znanosti u Osijeku i Slavonskom Brodu tijekom profesionalno-pedagoske prakse. U istraživanju su analizirana 343 sata Prirode i drustva na kojima je zadana domaca zadaca. Rezultati pokazuju da ucitelji nisu evaluirali veliki broj domacih zadaca ili su ih samo oznacili kao pregledane bez povratnih informacija o ucenickom napretku i postignucu. Stoga, istraživanje ukazuje na važnost planiranja, osmisljavanja i evaluacije zadataka domacega rada u nastavi Prirode i drustva. Kljucne rijeci: formativna evaluacija; ishodi ucenja; izvori domace zadace; kurikul; zadatci za domaci rad
科学和社会研究家庭作业评价/ Evaluacija domaće zadaće u Prirodi i društvu
系统地监测学生的学习成绩,鼓励和促进学生知识、技能和能力的发展,是学校的基本任务之一。除了在教学过程中监控学生的进度外,还会考虑监控和评估学生在家的独立作业。课程规划的新方法强调形成性评价的重要性,这意味着对学习过程的监测和反馈。一个精心设计的家庭作业任务可以很好地反映学生在校外独立学习方面的进步。创建和评估建构主义家庭作业可以监控学生研究技能的发展,这是科学和社会研究的两个关键评估要素之一。本文的目的是确定教师评估家庭作业的频率以及教师评估科学和社会研究课程家庭作业的方式。此外,目的是确定家庭作业的主要评估来源。一项抽样研究包括83名小学教师,由奥西耶克和斯拉旺斯基布罗德教育学院的学生在其专业教学实践中观察他们对学生家庭作业的分配、评估和评价。这项研究分析了343节布置家庭作业的科学和社会研究课程。结果显示,教师没有评估大量的家庭作业,或者只是将其标记为复习,而没有对学生的进步和成就进行任何反馈。因此,这项研究反映了在科学和社会研究课程中计划、创建和评估家庭作业的重要性。关键词:课程设置;形成性评价;家庭作业;学习成果;家庭作业的来源——Sustavno pracenje ucenickih postignuca, kao i poticanje poboljsanje razvoja njihovih znanja, vjestina i sposobnosti, jedna je osnovnih zadaca skole。Osim praenja napretka ucenika tijekom procesa poucavanja, također smo razmotrili praenje i evaluaciju samostalnoga rada ucenika kokce。Novi pristup planiranju kurikula naglasava važnost形成性评价(formation evaluacije),用于评价(buhvaca pracenje)、(davanje poratnih informacija)、(procu ucenja)。Dobro osmisljena zadaca može biti odlican pokazatelj napretka u samostalnom radu ucenika izvan skole。kreranje i evaluacija konstruktitique domadace omogucuje pracenje razvoja ucenickh istraživackih vjestina kjednog od kljuchielenata evaluacije u prepremeta Priroda i drustvo。研究结果表明,在不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下,不同的实验条件下。奥西姆·托加,生物多样性,生物多样性,生物多样性,生物多样性,生物多样性,生物多样性。研究对象为83名大学生,研究对象为3名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生,研究对象为1名大学生。U istraživanju su analizirana 343 sata Prirode i drustva na kojima je zadana domaca zadaca。研究结果表明,在中国农村农村地区,农村农村地区的农村农村地区的农村农村地区,农村农村地区的农村农村地区的农村农村地区,农村农村地区的农村农村地区的农村农村地区,农村农村地区的农村农村地区是农村农村地区。Stoga, istraživanje ukazuje na važnost planiranja, osmisljavanja i evaluacije zadataka domacega rada u nastavi Prirode i drustva。kljune rijeci:形成性评价;ishodi ucenja;Izvori domace;kurikul;扎达奇扎达奇拉德