Estimating cation exchange capacity and clay content from agricultural soil testing data

IF 1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Räty, R. Keskinen, M. Yli-Halla, J. Hyvönen, H. Soinne
{"title":"Estimating cation exchange capacity and clay content from agricultural soil testing data","authors":"M. Räty, R. Keskinen, M. Yli-Halla, J. Hyvönen, H. Soinne","doi":"10.23986/afsci.111107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clay content and the ability to reversibly retain cations affect many essential chemical and physical properties of soil, such as pH buffering and carbon sequestration. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) and base saturation are also commonly used as criteria in soil classification. However, determination of CEC and particle-size distribution is laborious and not included in routine soil testing. In this study, pedotransfer functions including soil test cations (STCat; Ca2+ + Mg2+ + K+), pH and soil organic carbon (SOC, %) as explanatory variables were developed for estimating CEC, titratable acidity (TA; H+ + Al3+) and clay content (clay, %). In addition, reference values for potential CEC and its components were determined for Finnish mineral and organic soils. The mean of potential CEC extracted by 1 M ammonium acetate at pH 7.0 ranged from 14 (range 6.4−25) in coarse soils to 33 (21−45) cmol(+) kg-1 in heavy clay soils, and from 42 (24−82) in mull soils to 77 (25−138) cmol(+) kg-1 in peat soils. The average CEC of clay and SOC were 27 and 160 cmol(+) kg-1, respectively. Titratable acidity occupied 53% and around 40% of the CEC sites in organic and mineral soils, respectively, evidencing that it is a prominent component of the potential CEC in these predominantly acidic soils. STCat, pH and SOC explained 96% of the variation in potential CEC. STCat and pH can be used in estimating the clay content especially for soils containing over 30% clay. In coarse textured soils, in contrast, SOC hampers the STCat based estimation of clay content.","PeriodicalId":7393,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Food Science","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.111107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Clay content and the ability to reversibly retain cations affect many essential chemical and physical properties of soil, such as pH buffering and carbon sequestration. Cation exchange capacity (CEC) and base saturation are also commonly used as criteria in soil classification. However, determination of CEC and particle-size distribution is laborious and not included in routine soil testing. In this study, pedotransfer functions including soil test cations (STCat; Ca2+ + Mg2+ + K+), pH and soil organic carbon (SOC, %) as explanatory variables were developed for estimating CEC, titratable acidity (TA; H+ + Al3+) and clay content (clay, %). In addition, reference values for potential CEC and its components were determined for Finnish mineral and organic soils. The mean of potential CEC extracted by 1 M ammonium acetate at pH 7.0 ranged from 14 (range 6.4−25) in coarse soils to 33 (21−45) cmol(+) kg-1 in heavy clay soils, and from 42 (24−82) in mull soils to 77 (25−138) cmol(+) kg-1 in peat soils. The average CEC of clay and SOC were 27 and 160 cmol(+) kg-1, respectively. Titratable acidity occupied 53% and around 40% of the CEC sites in organic and mineral soils, respectively, evidencing that it is a prominent component of the potential CEC in these predominantly acidic soils. STCat, pH and SOC explained 96% of the variation in potential CEC. STCat and pH can be used in estimating the clay content especially for soils containing over 30% clay. In coarse textured soils, in contrast, SOC hampers the STCat based estimation of clay content.
从农业土壤测试数据估计阳离子交换容量和粘土含量
粘土含量和可逆保留阳离子的能力影响土壤的许多基本化学和物理性质,如pH缓冲和碳固存。阳离子交换容量(CEC)和碱基饱和度也是土壤分类的常用指标。然而,测定CEC和颗粒大小分布是费力的,不包括在常规土壤测试。在本研究中,土壤传递函数包括土壤测试阳离子(STCat;以Ca2+ + Mg2+ + K+)、pH和土壤有机碳(SOC, %)作为解释变量,用于估算CEC、可滴定酸度(TA;H+ + Al3+)和粘土含量(粘土,%)。此外,确定了芬兰矿物和有机土壤中潜在CEC及其组分的参考值。在pH 7.0条件下,1 M乙酸铵提取的潜在CEC平均值在粗质土中为14(6.4 ~ 25)~重质粘土中为33 (21 ~ 45)cmol(+) kg-1,在白土中为42(24 ~ 82)~泥炭土中为77 (25 ~ 138)cmol(+) kg-1。粘土和有机碳的平均CEC分别为27和160 cmol(+) kg-1。可滴定酸度分别占有机土壤和矿质土壤CEC位点的53%和40%左右,这表明它是这些主要酸性土壤中潜在CEC的重要组成部分。STCat、pH和SOC解释了96%的潜在CEC变化。STCat和pH值可用于估算粘土含量,特别是粘土含量超过30%的土壤。相比之下,在粗质土壤中,SOC阻碍了基于STCat的粘土含量估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural and Food Science
Agricultural and Food Science 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Food Science (AFSci) publishes original research reports on agriculture and food research related to primary production and which have a northern dimension. The fields within the scope of the journal include agricultural economics, agricultural engineering, animal science, environmental science, horticulture, plant and soil science and primary production-related food science. Papers covering both basic and applied research are welcome. AFSci is published by the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland. AFSci, former The Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland, has been published regularly since 1928. Alongside the printed version, online publishing began in 2000. Since the year 2010 Agricultural and Food Science has only been available online as an Open Access journal, provided to the user free of charge. Full texts are available online from 1945 on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信